Hi Gu,
2013-11-18 (월), 17:21 +0800, Gu Zheng:
> Hi Kim,
> On 11/18/2013 05:12 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>
> > This patch removes an unnecessary semaphore (i.e., sbi->bio_sem).
> > There is no reason to use the semaphore when f2fs submits read and write
> > IOs.
> > Instead, let's use a write mutex
Hi Kim,
On 11/18/2013 05:12 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> This patch removes an unnecessary semaphore (i.e., sbi->bio_sem).
> There is no reason to use the semaphore when f2fs submits read and write IOs.
> Instead, let's use a write mutex and cover the sbi->bio[] by the lock.
My god, I just sent out a
This patch removes an unnecessary semaphore (i.e., sbi->bio_sem).
There is no reason to use the semaphore when f2fs submits read and write IOs.
Instead, let's use a write mutex and cover the sbi->bio[] by the lock.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
---
fs/f2fs/data.c| 4
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h|
