On 12/05/2019 03:06 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 08:56:07AM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
And, as I asked twice in the last round of review, did you benchmark
this change?
Before sending this v2 patch, I have done the test used with your test
program and already pointed out
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 08:56:07AM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> > And, as I asked twice in the last round of review, did you benchmark
> > this change?
>
> Before sending this v2 patch, I have done the test used with your test
> program and already pointed out the following implementation is
On 12/03/2019 09:56 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 08:56:50PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
There exists many similar and duplicate codes to check "." and "..",
so introduce is_dot_dotdot helper to make the code more clean.
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang
---
v2:
- use the
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 08:56:50PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> There exists many similar and duplicate codes to check "." and "..",
> so introduce is_dot_dotdot helper to make the code more clean.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang
> ---
>
> v2:
> - use the better performance implementation of
