Re: [OT] How to serve apt. http vs nfs

2009-01-08 Diskussionsfäden Holger Levsen
Hi, I also only use apt via http, usually with squid as a proxy. I do this, due the ease of setup and because I can use http everywhere. Using nfs is faster though: with http, the .debs get first downloaded (and written) to /var/cache/apt/archives and then are unpacked, while if you use nfs

Re: [OT] How to serve apt. http vs nfs

2009-01-08 Diskussionsfäden Thomas Lange
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:58:11 +0100, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org said: Using nfs is faster though: No, not really. I did some performance tests in the past, and there were no real differences in the installation times. Sometimes http was slightly faster than NFS, but I think this

Re: Problems with FAI 3.2.15 and Ubuntu Hardy (8.04.1)

2009-01-08 Diskussionsfäden Thomas Lange
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:30:03 -0800, Allan Bailey al...@nefud.org said: I've built and tested FAI 3.2.15 from an ubuntu hardy server (x86_64) using VMware instances, and they boot and install fine. With the same vmlinuz and initrd an actual hardware box hangs at mounting /.

Re: [OT] How to serve apt. http vs nfs

2009-01-08 Diskussionsfäden Holger Levsen
Hi Thomas, On Donnerstag, 8. Januar 2009, Thomas Lange wrote: No, not really. I did some performance tests in the past, and there were no real differences in the installation times. Sometimes http was slightly faster than NFS, but I think this was the cause of the NFS server. Interesting,

Re: [OT] How to serve apt. http vs nfs

2009-01-08 Diskussionsfäden Henning Glawe
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 12:41:00PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: On Donnerstag, 8. Januar 2009, Thomas Lange wrote: No, not really. I did some performance tests in the past, and there were no real differences in the installation times. Sometimes http was slightly faster than NFS, but I think

Re: Problems with FAI 3.2.15 and Ubuntu Hardy (8.04.1)

2009-01-08 Diskussionsfäden Ryan Steele
Thomas Lange wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:30:03 -0800, Allan Bailey al...@nefud.org said: I've built and tested FAI 3.2.15 from an ubuntu hardy server (x86_64) using VMware instances, and they boot and install fine. With the same vmlinuz and initrd an actual

How do you automate fai installations?

2009-01-08 Diskussionsfäden Adrian Gibanel Lopez
How do you automate fai installations? :) It seems like a loop or a joke: automate an automatic installation ;). I mean what's the normal use of FAI in a lab? You run something like: fai-setup -v and then fai-chboot -IFv specialhosts* You reboot manually? the computers and let them install.

fai-setup and error.log doubts - ubuntu 8.10 server and client

2009-01-08 Diskussionsfäden Adrian Gibanel Lopez
I continue with some tests from my recently created fai, live-initramfs and initramfs-tools packages. These packages make possible Ubuntu 8.10 to serve Ubuntu 8.10 for the install clients. I will upload these packages soon and probably send the .diff files here at the list for you to

Re: How do you automate fai installations?

2009-01-08 Diskussionsfäden Ryan Steele
Adrian Gibanel Lopez wrote: How do you automate fai installations? :) It seems like a loop or a joke: automate an automatic installation ;). I mean what's the normal use of FAI in a lab? You run something like: fai-setup -v and then fai-chboot -IFv specialhosts* You reboot manually? the

live-initramfs

2009-01-08 Diskussionsfäden Henning Fehrmann
Hello, I installed the fai-server version 3.2.15. Running make-fai-nfsroot I get the following message: Removing `local diversion of /usr/sbin/update-initramfs to /usr/sbin/update-initramfs.distrib' `/srv/fai/nfsroot/live/filesystem.dir/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.27.10-faiinstall' -

Re: live-initramfs

2009-01-08 Diskussionsfäden Thomas Lange
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:36:35 +0100, Henning Fehrmann henning.fehrm...@aei.mpg.de said: I guess, a proper initrd has to come already with the kernel. not really, because dpkg-reconfigure linux-image... should be called, which creates the initrd. Creating the initrd for the kernel, do

Re: How do you automate fai installations?

2009-01-08 Diskussionsfäden Thomas Lange
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:35:47 +0100 (CET), Adrian Gibanel Lopez agiba...@alumnes.udl.cat said: So I re-ask my question. What's the best way for modiying FAI_FLAGS? Use fai-chboot for that. See man fai-chboot for more information. You have to call fai-chboot -o default once on your

Re: How do you automate fai installations?

2009-01-08 Diskussionsfäden Adrian Gibanel Lopez
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:35:47 +0100 (CET), Adrian Gibanel Lopez agiba...@alumnes.udl.cat said: So I re-ask my question. What's the best way for modiying FAI_FLAGS? Use fai-chboot for that. See man fai-chboot for more information. You have to call fai-chboot -o default once on your

Re: How do you automate fai installations?

2009-01-08 Diskussionsfäden Thomas Lange
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:56:06 +0100 (CET), Adrian Gibanel Lopez agiba...@alumnes.udl.cat said: I have to say that I have some errors written at errors.log when installing (after running fai-chboot -IFv and booting). Let's have a look at the code in lib/subroutines: task_faiend() {

Re: How do you automate fai installations?

2009-01-08 Diskussionsfäden Adrian Gibanel Lopez
Where am I supposed to add reboot FAI_FLAGS? The guide says something about FAI_FLAGS at Bootp daemon but I use dhcp. So I re-ask my question. What's the best way for modiying FAI_FLAGS? Thank you. http://www.informatik.uni-koeln.de/fai/fai-guide/ch-config.html#s-s1 Please read the