Re: Request-for-Review of Stable Release 3.4.3 (was: Another issue with RAID preserve in 3.4.x)

2010-10-05 Thread Michael Tautschnig
> * Thomas Lange [Mon Oct 04, 2010 at > 04:05:32PM +0200]: > > > On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:06:02 +0200, Michael Tautschnig > > > said: > > > > It's a bit more than a ping: I think we urgently need some definite > > information > > > on the kernel command line issues (see the "Inst

Re: Request-for-Review of Stable Release 3.4.3 (was: Another issue with RAID preserve in 3.4.x)

2010-10-04 Thread Michael Prokop
* Thomas Lange [Mon Oct 04, 2010 at 04:05:32PM +0200]: > > On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:06:02 +0200, Michael Tautschnig > > said: > > It's a bit more than a ping: I think we urgently need some definite > information > > on the kernel command line issues (see the "Installing Debian Sq

Re: Request-for-Review of Stable Release 3.4.3 (was: Another issue with RAID preserve in 3.4.x)

2010-10-04 Thread Thomas Lange
> On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:06:02 +0200, Michael Tautschnig > said: > It's a bit more than a ping: I think we urgently need some definite information > on the kernel command line issues (see the "Installing Debian Squeeze (i386) - > No $HOSTNAME set"-thread). OK, I now can con

Re: Request-for-Review of Stable Release 3.4.3 (was: Another issue with RAID preserve in 3.4.x)

2010-10-04 Thread Michael Tautschnig
> * Michael Tautschnig [Fri Oct 01, 2010 at 06:49:20PM +0200]: > > > > > Please comment ASAP, I'd like to release it until beginning of next > > > > week so Stephan gets a chance for pushing 3.4.3 into Ubuntu as well. > > > > Full ACK, I'd just like to request 6091 to be taken into account as we

Re: Request-for-Review of Stable Release 3.4.3 (was: Another issue with RAID preserve in 3.4.x)

2010-10-04 Thread Thomas Lange
> On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:06:02 +0200, Michael Tautschnig > said: > It's a bit more than a ping: I think we urgently need some definite information > on the kernel command line issues (see the "Installing Debian Squeeze (i386) - > No $HOSTNAME set"-thread). > @Thomas: Co

Re: Request-for-Review of Stable Release 3.4.3 (was: Another issue with RAID preserve in 3.4.x)

2010-10-04 Thread Michael Tautschnig
> > On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:06:02 +0200, Michael Tautschnig > > said: > > > It's a bit more than a ping: I think we urgently need some definite > information > > on the kernel command line issues (see the "Installing Debian Squeeze > (i386) - > > No $HOSTNAME set"-thread). >

Re: Request-for-Review of Stable Release 3.4.3 (was: Another issue with RAID preserve in 3.4.x)

2010-10-04 Thread Stephan Hermann
Moins all, On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 06:23:35PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: > Please comment ASAP, I'd like to release it until beginning of next > week so Stephan gets a chance for pushing 3.4.3 into Ubuntu as well. Yes please...I'll try to push FAI 3.4.3 to Maverick as soon as it is released so

Re: Request-for-Review of Stable Release 3.4.3 (was: Another issue with RAID preserve in 3.4.x)

2010-10-01 Thread Michael Prokop
* Michael Tautschnig [Fri Oct 01, 2010 at 06:49:20PM +0200]: > > > Please comment ASAP, I'd like to release it until beginning of next > > > week so Stephan gets a chance for pushing 3.4.3 into Ubuntu as well. > > Full ACK, I'd just like to request 6091 to be taken into account as well. > Err,

Re: Request-for-Review of Stable Release 3.4.3 (was: Another issue with RAID preserve in 3.4.x)

2010-10-01 Thread Michael Tautschnig
> [...] > > > > > Thomas, Michael and Julien - I'd like to have especially your > > [N]ACKs. > > > > Requested by developers and having my ACK: > > > > 6060 setup-storage/Fstab.pm: Don't resolve LVM devices via readlink [...] > > 6068 raise importance of libproc-daemon-perl to Recommends (clo

Re: Request-for-Review of Stable Release 3.4.3 (was: Another issue with RAID preserve in 3.4.x)

2010-10-01 Thread Michael Tautschnig
[...] > > Thomas, Michael and Julien - I'd like to have especially your > [N]ACKs. > > Requested by developers and having my ACK: > > 6060 setup-storage/Fstab.pm: Don't resolve LVM devices via readlink [...] > 6068 raise importance of libproc-daemon-perl to Recommends (closes: #593089) > 607

Request-for-Review of Stable Release 3.4.3 (was: Another issue with RAID preserve in 3.4.x)

2010-10-01 Thread Michael Prokop
Hi, * Julien BLACHE [Thu Sep 30, 2010 at 05:39:49PM +0200]: > Just a heads up (mainly for Mika wrt 3.4.3) about another issue with > RAID preserve in 3.4.x on Squeeze. > The output of mdadm changed again, so parsing that fails early on and > that breaks setup-storage. > I'll have a patch tomor