On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 15:56, Trond Myklebust wrote:
on den 13.04.2005 Klokka 10:45 (+1000) skreiv Greg Banks:
There's now a patch to actually do it, see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-nfsm=111087383132762w=2
Does anyone want to give a firm yea or nea to this approach? I'd
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:14:10 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
There are uses for both. For example today I was updating the tar ball
which is used to create the var file system for a new chroot. I
certainly
want to see corretly setup owner/permissions when I look into that tar
Aren't there some assumptions in VFS that currently make this
impossible?
I believe it's OK with VFS, but applications would be confused to death.
Well, there really is one issue -- dentries have exactly one parent, so
what do you do when opening a file with hardlinks as a directory? (In
Look up the rather large linux-kernel linux-fsdevel thread silent
semantic changes with reiser4 and it's followup threads, from last
year.
Wow, it's 700+ messages. I got through the first 40, and already feel
dizzy :)
It's already been tried. You will also find sensible ideas on what
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
Look up the rather large linux-kernel linux-fsdevel thread silent
semantic changes with reiser4 and it's followup threads, from last
year.
Wow, it's 700+ messages. I got through the first 40, and already feel
dizzy :)
It's easier if you skip the ones by Hans and
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
Yet, the results from stat() don't distinguish the number spaces,
and ls doesn't map the numbers to names properly in the wrong
space.
Well you can use ls -n. It's up to the tools to present the
information you want in the way you want it. If a tool can't do that,
Yet, the results from stat() don't distinguish the number spaces,
and ls doesn't map the numbers to names properly in the wrong
space.
Well you can use ls -n. It's up to the tools to present the
information you want in the way you want it. If a tool can't do that,
tough, but
== Regarding [autofs] Re: [ANNOUNCE] Important update - autofs 4.1.4 release;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] adds:
raven On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Here is autofs 4.1.4.
raven There were a couple of mistakes in the release.
raven The kernel patches have been updated as there
