[GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs/eCryptfs cleanups

2007-02-17 Thread Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
You can pull from 'master' branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jsipek/unionfs.git to receive the following: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek (1): fs/unionfs/: Remove unused structure members macros Michael Halcrow (1): eCryptfs: convert lookup_one_len() to lookup_one_len_nd()

[PATCH 2/2] fs/unionfs/: Remove unused structure members macros

2007-02-17 Thread Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
This patch removes: - hidden_mnt pointer from struct unionfs_data - mount_flag from struct unionfs_sb_info - mount_flag related macros Signed-off-by: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- fs/unionfs/union.h |9 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 1/2] eCryptfs: convert lookup_one_len() to lookup_one_len_nd()

2007-02-17 Thread Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
From: Michael Halcrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] Call the new lookup_one_len_nd() rather than lookup_one_len(). This fixes an oops when stacked on NFS. Note that there are still some issues with eCryptfs on NFS having to do with directory deletion (I'm not getting an oops, just an -EBUSY).

Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] consolidate generic_writepages and mpage_writepages]

2007-02-17 Thread Miklos Szeredi
Maybe cifs_writepages() too can use this infrastructure, but I'm not touching that with a ten-foot pole. The cifs case ought to be one of the simpler ones, pseudo-code is pretty easy, the hard part is all of the stuff unrelated to cifs: Ideally if there were generic functions to help

Re: [PATCH] Fix d_path for lazy unmounts

2007-02-17 Thread Andreas Gruenbacher
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 19:13, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: So here is how this could be implemented. See the lengthy explanations in the patch headers, too. Turns out I messed up with one of Neil's review comments. Here is yet another update. With this fix, everything works as expected

[git patch, resend] remove JFFS v1

2007-02-17 Thread Jeff Garzik
[just sent this upstream; obvious file-removal patch snipped for size] (resend) Why:Unmaintained for years, superceded by JFFS2 for years. Please pull from 'kill-jffs' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/misc-2.6.git kill-jffs to receive the following updates:

Re: File system awareness (or lack thereof) of vfs granting of leases

2007-02-17 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 12:32:42AM -0500, Wendy Cheng wrote: Robert Rappaport wrote: [snip] This is because the vfs running on the same node where the samba server is running is not necessarily aware of all accesses to the file on which it is granting a lease. Since vfs does not