On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 08:41 +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
> logic. Any ideas how this could be fixed?
BTW, no idea, fs is taboo land here. (panic() is my very favorite
function...;)
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 08:41 +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
> BTW Mike: Your server bounces my messages.
Hm. I don't have a server. Might have something to do with some
naughty task frequently scribbling zeros to /etc/resolv.conf when I
brutally reboot my box (i give myself cause to do that quite a lot
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
- for mount ID's use IDA (from the IDR library) instead of a 32bit
counter, which could overflow
IDAs tend to get reused quickly, which can cause race conditions. Any
reason not to just use a 64-bit counter?
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
add cc (ingo)
and then please update to CFS-v24.1
http://people.redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/sched-cfs-v2.6.22.15-v24.1.patch
On 1/19/08, Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) wrote:
> > This kernel is vanilla 2.6.22.y or with CFS?
>
> Yes wit
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>
> But 'fusermount -u /tmp/test' does work, doesn't it?
You're submitting patches to get rid of fusermount, aren't you?
Most users absolutely have no idea what fusermount is and they would
__really__ like to see umount(8) working finally.
S
Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) wrote:
> This kernel is vanilla 2.6.22.y or with CFS?
Yes with CFSv20.4, as in the log.
It also hangs on 2.6.23.13
> On 1/19/08, Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was just attacked by some deadlock issue involving sqlite3 and
> > konqueror. While sqlite3 con
> > This is an experimental patch for supporing unprivileged mounts and
> > umounts.
>
> User unmount unfortunately still doesn't work if the kernel doesn't have
> the unprivileged mount support but as we discussed this in last July that
> shouldn't be needed for this case.
>
> % mount -t n
This kernel is vanilla 2.6.22.y or with CFS?
On 1/19/08, Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just attacked by some deadlock issue involving sqlite3 and konqueror.
> While sqlite3 continues to slowly fill a 7M-record db in transaction mode,
> konqueror hangs for a few minutes, then continue
I was just attacked by some deadlock issue involving sqlite3 and konqueror.
While sqlite3 continues to slowly fill a 7M-record db in transaction mode,
konqueror hangs for a few minutes, then continues only to hang again and again.
Looks like an fs/blockIO issue involving fsync.
As a workaround,
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> This is an experimental patch for supporing unprivileged mounts and
> umounts.
User unmount unfortunately still doesn't work if the kernel doesn't have
the unprivileged mount support but as we discussed this in last July that
shouldn't be needed f
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Karel Zak wrote:
> mount:
>- doesn't drop privileges properly when calling helpers [Ludwig Nussel]
How can a mount helper know without being setuid root and redundantly doing
mount(8)'s work that the user is allowed to mount via the 'user[s]' fstab
mount option?
Hi!
> > I guess I should try to measure it. (Linux already does writeback
> > caching, with 2GB of memory. I wonder how important disks's 2MB of
> > cache can be).
>
> It serves essentially the same purpose as the 'async' option in /etc/exports
> (i.e. we declare it "done" when the other end of t
Seems, most people would be happier with a new file, instead of
extending /proc/mounts.
This patch is the first attempt at doing that, as well as fixing the
issues found in the previous submission.
Thanks,
Miklos
---
From: Ram Pai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
/proc/mounts in its current state fail to di
13 matches
Mail list logo
