On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 04:43:52PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 07:19:21PM -0800, Brian Pomerantz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 02:17:37PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
In testing/fixing ramfs I've discovered a bug where umount() fails
with -EBUSY for no readily
problem
with an ext fs on a loop device (while running the LSB/Posix
testsuite).
Has anyone else encountered this problem?
--
David Gibson, Technical Support Engineer, Linuxcare, Inc.
+61 2 6262 8990
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.linuxcare.com/
Linuxcare. Support for the revolution.
-
To unsubscribe
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 07:19:21PM -0800, Brian Pomerantz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 02:17:37PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
In testing/fixing ramfs I've discovered a bug where umount() fails
with -EBUSY for no readily apparent reason. I haven't yet found any
way to unmount the fs once
*nothing* (except ramfs) ever sets PG_dirty (grepping for
PG_dirty and SetPageDirty). What am I missing?
--
David Gibson, Technical Support Engineer, Linuxcare, Inc.
+61 2 6262 8990
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.linuxcare.com/
Linuxcare. Support for the revolution.
-
To unsubscribe from this list
. The resource limit patch
does use mount options to set the limits.
--
David Gibson, Technical Support Engineer, Linuxcare, Inc.
+61 2 6262 8990
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.linuxcare.com/
Linuxcare. Support for the revolution.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fs
