Hello!
On Jan 18, 2008, at 6:07 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 02:41:57PM -0800, Marc Eshel wrote:
The problem seems to be with the fact that the client and server
are on
the same machine. This test work fine with or without an
underlaying fs
that supports locking when
Hello!
On Dec 3, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Felix Blyakher wrote:
Per our discussion, I am resending this patch that fixes a leak
in nlmsvc_testlock.
It is addition to another leak fixing patch you already have.
Without the patch, there is a leakage of nlmblock structure
refcount that holds a
Hello!
There is a problem with blocking async posix lock enqueue in
2.6.22 and 2.6.23 kernels.
Lock call to underlying FS is done just fine, but when fl_grant
is called to inform lockd
of succesful granting, nothing happens, and no reply to client is
sent. The end result
Hello!
Per our discussion, I am resending this patch that fixes a leak in
nlmsvc_testlock.
It is addition to another leak fixing patch you already have.
Without the patch, there is a leakage of nlmblock structure
refcount that holds a
reference nlmfile structure, that holds a
