On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 03:37:45AM -0400, Mingming Cao wrote:
This patch is on top of i_version_update_vfs.
The i_version field of the inode is set on inode creation and incremented when
the inode is being modified.
Which is not what i_version is supposed to do. It'll get you tons of misses
On Jul 11, 2007 09:47 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 03:37:45AM -0400, Mingming Cao wrote:
This patch is on top of i_version_update_vfs.
The i_version field of the inode is set on inode creation and incremented
when the inode is being modified.
Which is not what
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 09:47 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 03:37:45AM -0400, Mingming Cao wrote:
This patch is on top of i_version_update_vfs.
The i_version field of the inode is set on inode creation and incremented
when
the inode is being modified.
Which is
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 05:52:24AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Jul 11, 2007 09:47 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 03:37:45AM -0400, Mingming Cao wrote:
This patch is on top of i_version_update_vfs.
The i_version field of the inode is set on inode creation and
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:37:45 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch is on top of i_version_update_vfs.
The i_version field of the inode is set on inode creation and incremented when
the inode is being modified.
Again, I don't think I've ever seen this patch before. It is at
Mingming Cao wrote:
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4/fs/ext4/super.c
===
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4.orig/fs/ext4/super.c 2007-06-13 17:19:11.0
-0700
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc4/fs/ext4/super.c2007-06-13 17:24:45.0 -0700
@@
On Jul 03, 2007 12:19 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Mingming Cao wrote:
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4/fs/ext4/super.c
===
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4.orig/fs/ext4/super.c2007-06-13
17:19:11.0 -0700
+++
