Hi.
Here is version 2 of a patch set which modifies the system to
enhance the ESTALE error handling for system calls which take
pathnames as arguments.
The error, ESTALE, was originally introduced to handle the
situation where a file handle, which NFS uses to uniquely
identify a file on the serv
J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:12:03PM -0500, Peter Staubach wrote:
Chuck Lever wrote:
On Jan 18, 2008, at 12:30 PM, Peter Staubach wrote:
I can probably imagine a situation where the pathname resolution
would never finish, but I am not sure that it could ever
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:12:03PM -0500, Peter Staubach wrote:
> Chuck Lever wrote:
>> On Jan 18, 2008, at 12:30 PM, Peter Staubach wrote:
>>> I can probably imagine a situation where the pathname resolution
>>> would never finish, but I am not sure that it could ever happen
>>> in nature.
>>
>> U
Hi Peter-
On Jan 18, 2008, at 12:30 PM, Peter Staubach wrote:
Chuck Lever wrote:
On Jan 18, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Peter Staubach wrote:
Chuck Lever wrote:
Hi Peter-
On Jan 18, 2008, at 10:35 AM, Peter Staubach wrote:
and the window in between the revalidation
and the actual use of the file han
Chuck Lever wrote:
On Jan 18, 2008, at 12:30 PM, Peter Staubach wrote:
Chuck Lever wrote:
On Jan 18, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Peter Staubach wrote:
Chuck Lever wrote:
Hi Peter-
On Jan 18, 2008, at 10:35 AM, Peter Staubach wrote:
Hi.
Here is a patch set which modifies the system to enhance the
ES
On Jan 18, 2008, at 12:30 PM, Peter Staubach wrote:
Chuck Lever wrote:
On Jan 18, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Peter Staubach wrote:
Chuck Lever wrote:
Hi Peter-
On Jan 18, 2008, at 10:35 AM, Peter Staubach wrote:
Hi.
Here is a patch set which modifies the system to enhance the
ESTALE error handling
Chuck Lever wrote:
On Jan 18, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Peter Staubach wrote:
Chuck Lever wrote:
Hi Peter-
On Jan 18, 2008, at 10:35 AM, Peter Staubach wrote:
Hi.
Here is a patch set which modifies the system to enhance the
ESTALE error handling for system calls which take pathnames
as arguments.
On Jan 18, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Peter Staubach wrote:
Chuck Lever wrote:
Hi Peter-
On Jan 18, 2008, at 10:35 AM, Peter Staubach wrote:
Hi.
Here is a patch set which modifies the system to enhance the
ESTALE error handling for system calls which take pathnames
as arguments.
The VFS already han
Chuck Lever wrote:
Hi Peter-
On Jan 18, 2008, at 10:35 AM, Peter Staubach wrote:
Hi.
Here is a patch set which modifies the system to enhance the
ESTALE error handling for system calls which take pathnames
as arguments.
The VFS already handles ESTALE.
If a pathname resolution encounters an
Hi Peter-
On Jan 18, 2008, at 10:35 AM, Peter Staubach wrote:
Hi.
Here is a patch set which modifies the system to enhance the
ESTALE error handling for system calls which take pathnames
as arguments.
The VFS already handles ESTALE.
If a pathname resolution encounters an ESTALE at any point,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 10:35:50AM -0500, Peter Staubach wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Here is a patch set which modifies the system to enhance the
> ESTALE error handling for system calls which take pathnames
> as arguments.
I think your cover letter may be bigger than any of the actual
patches I'm not c
Hi.
Here is a patch set which modifies the system to enhance the
ESTALE error handling for system calls which take pathnames
as arguments.
The error, ESTALE, was originally introduced to handle the
situation where a file handle, which NFS uses to uniquely
identify a file on the server, no longer
12 matches
Mail list logo
