Takashi Sato wrote:
o Elevate XFS ioctl numbers (XFS_IOC_FREEZE and XFS_IOC_THAW) to the VFS
As Andreas Dilger and Christoph Hellwig advised me, I have elevated
them to include/linux/fs.h as below.
#define FIFREEZE_IOWR('X', 119, int)
#define FITHAW _IOWR('X',
On Feb 26, 2008 08:39 -0800, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Takashi Sato wrote:
o Elevate XFS ioctl numbers (XFS_IOC_FREEZE and XFS_IOC_THAW) to the VFS
As Andreas Dilger and Christoph Hellwig advised me, I have elevated
them to include/linux/fs.h as below.
#define FIFREEZE
Hi,
#defineFS_IOC_GETFLAGS _IOR('f', 1, long)
#defineFS_IOC_SETFLAGS _IOW('f', 2, long)
as generic vfs ioctls. These ioctls started out as
EXT2_IOC_SETFLAGS/EXT2_IOC_GETFLAGS but they were generically useful,
other filesystems picked them up, and
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:51:15PM +0900, Takashi Sato wrote:
So XFS_IOC_FREEZE and XFS_IOC_THAW cannot be lifted to generic code simply.
I think we should create new generic numbers for freeze and thaw
Actually we've lifted specific ioctls to the generic layer before all
the time in drivers.
Hi,
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 08:26:57AM -0500, Andreas Dilger wrote:
You may as well make the common ioctl the same as the XFS version,
both by number and parameters, so that applications which already
understand the XFS ioctl will work on other filesystems.
Yes. In
Takashi Sato wrote:
Hi,
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 08:26:57AM -0500, Andreas Dilger wrote:
You may as well make the common ioctl the same as the XFS version,
both by number and parameters, so that applications which already
understand the XFS ioctl will work on other
Hi,
P.S. Oh yeah, it should be noted that freezing at the filesystem
layer does *not* guarantee that changes to the block device aren't
happening via mmap()'ed files. The LVM needs to freeze writes the
block device level if it wants to guarantee a completely stable
snapshot image. So the
Hi,
Ted wrote:
And I do agree that we probably should just implement this in
filesystem independent way, in which case all of the filesystems that
support this already have super_operations functions
write_super_lockfs() and unlockfs().
So if this is done using a new system call, there should
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 08:26:57AM -0500, Andreas Dilger wrote:
You may as well make the common ioctl the same as the XFS version,
both by number and parameters, so that applications which already
understand the XFS ioctl will work on other filesystems.
Yes. In facy you should be able to lift
On Feb 08, 2008 19:48 +0900, Takashi Sato wrote:
OK I would like to implement the freeze feature on VFS
as the filesystem independent ioctl so that it can be
available on filesystems that have already had write_super_lockfs()
and unlockfs().
The usage for the freeze ioctl is the following.
Hi,
What you *could* do is to start putting processes to sleep if they
attempt to write to the frozen filesystem, and then detect the
deadlock case where the process holding the file descriptor used to
freeze the filesystem gets frozen because it attempted to write to the
filesystem --- at
Sato-san,
What you *could* do is to start putting processes to sleep if they
attempt to write to the frozen filesystem, and then detect the
deadlock case where the process holding the file descriptor used to
freeze the filesystem gets frozen because it attempted to write to the
Hi,
What you *could* do is to start putting processes to sleep if they
attempt to write to the frozen filesystem, and then detect the
deadlock case where the process holding the file descriptor used to
freeze the filesystem gets frozen because it attempted to write to the
filesystem --- at
Hi,
Thank you for your comments.
That's inherently unsafe - you can have multiple unfreezes
running in parallel which seriously screws with the bdev semaphore
count that is used to lock the device due to doing multiple up()s
for every down.
Your timeout thingy guarantee that at some point you
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:42:30PM +0900, Takashi Sato wrote:
Hi,
I am also wondering whether we should have system call(s) for these:
On Jan 25, 2008 12:59 PM, Takashi Sato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ case EXT3_IOC_FREEZE: {
+ case EXT3_IOC_THAW: {
And just convert XFS to
Hi,
Currently, ext3 doesn't have the freeze feature which suspends write
requests. So, we cannot get a backup which keeps the filesystem's
consistency with the storage device's features (snapshot, replication)
while it is mounted.
In many case, a commercial filesystems (e.g. VxFS) has the freeze
Hi,
diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.24-rc8/Documentation/dontdiff
linux-2.6.24-rc8/include/linux/ext3_fs_sb.h
linux-2.6.24-rc8-freeze/include/linux/ext3_fs_sb.h
--- linux-2.6.24-rc8/include/linux/ext3_fs_sb.h 2008-01-16 13:22:48.0
+0900
+++
Hi,
I am also wondering whether we should have system call(s) for these:
On Jan 25, 2008 12:59 PM, Takashi Sato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ case EXT3_IOC_FREEZE: {
+ case EXT3_IOC_THAW: {
And just convert XFS to use them too?
I think it is reasonable to implement it as the
On 19:59 Fri 25 Jan , Takashi Sato wrote:
Hi,
Currently, ext3 doesn't have the freeze feature which suspends write
requests. So, we cannot get a backup which keeps the filesystem's
consistency with the storage device's features (snapshot, replication)
while it is mounted.
In many
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 04:35:26PM +1100, David Chinner wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 07:59:38PM +0900, Takashi Sato wrote:
The points of the implementation are followings.
- Add calls of the freeze function (freeze_bdev) and
the unfreeze function (thaw_bdev) in ext3_ioctl().
-
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 07:59:38PM +0900, Takashi Sato wrote:
The points of the implementation are followings.
- Add calls of the freeze function (freeze_bdev) and
the unfreeze function (thaw_bdev) in ext3_ioctl().
- ext3_freeze_timeout() which calls the unfreeze function (thaw_bdev)
is
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:42:30PM +0900, Takashi Sato wrote:
I am also wondering whether we should have system call(s) for these:
On Jan 25, 2008 12:59 PM, Takashi Sato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ case EXT3_IOC_FREEZE: {
+ case EXT3_IOC_THAW: {
And just convert XFS to use
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:34:25AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
But it was this concern which is why ext3 never exported freeze
functionality to userspace, even though other commercial filesystems
do support this. It wasn't that it wasn't considered, but the concern
about whether or not it
Theodore Tso wrote:
The other approach would be to say, oh well, the freeze ioctl is
inherently dangerous, and root is allowed to himself in the foot, so
who cares. :-)
I tend to agree. Either you need your fs frozen, or not, and if you do,
be prepared for the consequences.
But it was this
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:18:51PM +0300, Dmitri Monakhov wrote:
First of all Linux already have at least one open-source(dm-snap),
and several commercial snapshot solutions.
Yes, but it requires that the filesystem be stored under LVM. Unlike
what EVMS v1 allowed us to do, we can't currently
25 matches
Mail list logo
