Re: unionfs_copy_attr_times oopses

2008-02-19 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Erez Zadok wrote: Check out my latest set of patches (which correspond to release 2.2.4 of Unionfs). Thanks to your info and the patch, I was able to trigger several races more frequently, and fix them. I've tested my code with make -j N (for N=4 and N=20), on a 4 cpu

Re: unionfs_copy_attr_times oopses

2008-02-16 Thread Erez Zadok
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hugh Dickins writes: Hi Erez, Aside from the occasional unionfs: new lower inode mtime messages on directories (which I've got into the habit of ignoring now), the only problem I'm still suffering with unionfs over tmpfs (not tested any other fs's below it

Re: unionfs_copy_attr_times oopses

2008-02-01 Thread Erez Zadok
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hugh Dickins writes: Hi Erez, Aside from the occasional unionfs: new lower inode mtime messages on directories (which I've got into the habit of ignoring now), the only problem I'm still suffering with unionfs over tmpfs (not tested any other fs's below it