Hi,
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 07:34:55PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
ext2_notify_change() isn't referenced to from anywhere since a while.
Should it be removed? I'm asking since my ACL patch needs a
notify_change() function in ext2, and I'm not sure whether It's ok to
replace
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 01:19:41PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 07:34:55PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
ext2_notify_change() isn't referenced to from anywhere since a while.
Should it be removed?
Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
Hmmm. I don't see any use of notify_change with any of ATTR_FLAG_APPEND,
ATTR_FLAG_SYNCHRONOUS, ATTR_FLAG_NOATIME, ATTR_FLAG_IMMUTABLE set, so that
part of notify_change is not invoked. Currently, these special inode flags
are set through ioctl() directly.
Is the
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 02:28:16PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
Not if we re-enable notify_change --- if we do that, the filesystem
will rely on notify_change doing the right thing in such cases.
Hmmm. I don't see any use of
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 04:43:52PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 07:19:21PM -0800, Brian Pomerantz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 02:17:37PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
In testing/fixing ramfs I've discovered a bug where umount() fails
with -EBUSY for no readily
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 12:01:35PM +, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 11:54:24AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
I have not implemented O_SYNC in NWFS, but it looks like I need to add it
before posting the final patches. This patch appears to force
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 11:54:24AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
I have not implemented O_SYNC in NWFS, but it looks like I need to add it
before posting the final patches. This patch appears to force write-through
of only dirty inodes, and allow reads to continue from cache. Is this
