On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 19:55 +0400, Nikita Danilov wrote:
Badari Pulavarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 04:22, Nikita Danilov wrote:
Badari Pulavarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Yes. Its possible to do what you want to. I am currently working on
adding
Hi All,
Here are the updated patches to support multiple block allocation and
delayed allocation for ext3 done by me, Badari and Suparna.
[PATCH 1/4] -- multiple block allocation for current ext3.
(ext3_get_blocks()).
[PATCH 2/4] -- adding delayed allocation for writeback mode
[PATCH 3/4] --
support multiple block allocation for ext3 writeback mode through writepages().
---
linux-2.6.12-ming/fs/ext3/inode.c | 131
linux-2.6.12-ming/fs/mpage.c|8 +
linux-2.6.12-ming/include/linux/mpage.h | 17
3 files changed, 153
Updated patch from Suparna for generic support for cluster pages
together in mapge_writepages() to make use of getblocks()
---
linux-2.6.12-ming/fs/buffer.c | 49 -
linux-2.6.12-ming/fs/ext2/inode.c | 15 -
linux-2.6.12-ming/fs/ext3/inode.c |
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 10:40 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
Hi All,
Here are the updated patches to support multiple block allocation and
delayed allocation for ext3 done by me, Badari and Suparna.
Patches are against 2.6.13-rc3.
Mingming
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Here is the patch support multiple block allocation for ext3. Current
ext3 allocates one block at a time, not efficient for large sequential
write IO.
This patch implements a simply multiple block allocation with current
ext3. The basic idea is allocating the 1st block in the existing way,
and
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 19:47 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Jul 17, 2005 10:40 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
@@ -373,6 +373,7 @@ struct ext3_inode {
#define EXT3_MOUNT_BARRIER 0x2 /* Use block barriers */
#define EXT3_MOUNT_NOBH0x4 /* No bufferheads
On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 16:50 +0800, guomingyang wrote:
I also find many places where the block number type is not changed in
namei.c and dir.c. Why?
They are all file logical blocks, ext4_fsblk_t is for on disk blocks.
Takashi Sato has a patch to define all file logical blocks as
writes. Please apply.
Signed-Off-By: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux/fs/buffer.c.orig 2007-02-04 11:37:50.0 -0600
+++ linux/fs/buffer.c 2007-02-04 11:38:14.0 -0600
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@
void fastcall unlock_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 12:16 -0500, Xin Zhao wrote:
Hi,
Please forgive me if the question is dumb.
I am modifying ext3 to add some new features, but was confused by the
implementation of ext3_truncate().
In ext3_truncate():
we first use
n = ext3_block_to_path(inode, last_block,
Dave Kleikamp wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 14:59 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:44:16 +
Dave Kleikamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 14:25 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 00:04:45 +0530
Amit K. Arora [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jan Kara wrote:
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:40:54 +1100
Nathan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 14:25 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 00:04:45 +0530
Amit K. Arora [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is to give a heads up on few patches that we will be soon
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 13:58 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 7 May 2007 05:37:54 -0600
Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ block = offset blkbits;
+ max_blocks = (EXT4_BLOCK_ALIGN(len + offset, blkbits)
blkbits)
+- block;
+
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 16:31 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 7 May 2007 19:14:42 -0400
Theodore Tso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:38:56PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Actually, this is a non-issue. The reason that it is handled for
extent-only
is that
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 17:15 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 07 May 2007 17:00:24 -0700
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ while (ret = 0 ret max_blocks) {
+ block = block + ret;
+ max_blocks = max_blocks - ret;
+ ret
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 21:43 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 05:41:39PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
We could check the total number of fs free blocks account before
preallocation happens, if there isn't enough space left, there is no
need to bother preallocating
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 21:31 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
I have the updated patches ready which take care of Andrew's comments.
Will run some tests and post them soon.
But, before submitting these patches, I think it will be better to finalize
on certain things which might be worth some
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 01:07 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
ToDos:
-
1 Implementation on other architectures (other than i386, x86_64,
ppc64 and s390(x)). David Chinner has already posted a patch for ia64.
Here is the 2.6.22-rc1 version of David's patch: add fallocate() on ia64
From: David
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 23:44 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2007 19:41:15 +0530 Amit K. Arora [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fallocate() is a new system call being proposed here which will allow
applications to preallocate space to any file(s) in a file system.
I merged the first
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 18:25 +0200, Jean noel Cordenner wrote:
The patch is on top of the ext4 tree:
http://repo.or.cz/w/ext4-patch-queue.git
In this part, the i_version counter is stored into 2 32bit fields of
the ext4_inode structure osd1.linux1.l_i_version and i_version_hi.
I included
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 10:21 +1000, David Chinner wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 06:25:31PM +0200, Jean noel Cordenner wrote:
Hi,
This is an update of the i_version patch.
The i_version field is a 64bit counter that is set on every inode
creation and that is incremented every time the
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 16:58 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On May 29, 2007 12:44 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
I am a little bit confused about the two patches.
It appears in the ext4_expand_inode_extra_isize patch by Kalpak, there a
new 64 bit i_fs_version field is added to ext4 inode
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:33 +1000, David Chinner wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:32:57PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 10:21 +1000, David Chinner wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 06:25:31PM +0200, Jean noel Cordenner wrote:
Hi,
This is an update
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 02:55 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Please drop the non-ext4 patches from the ext4 tree and send incremental
patches against the (non-ext4) fallocate patches in -mm.
The ext4 fallocate() patches are dependent on the core fallocate()
patches, so ext4 patch-queue and git
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 13:57 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:50:04 -0400
Mingming Caoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the ext4 patch queue is in good shape now.
Which ext4 patches are you intending to merge into 2.6.23?
Please send all those out to lkml for review?
Turn on extents feature by default in ext4 filesystem. User could use
-o noextents to turn it off.
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4/fs/ext4/super.c
===
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4.orig/fs/ext4/super.c
with the patch all headers are checked. the code should become
more resistant to on-disk corruptions. needless BUG_ON() have
been removed. please, review for inclusion.
Signed-off-by: Alex Tomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4/fs/ext4
Set the journals JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT on devices with more
than 32bit block sizes during mount time. This ensure proper record
lenth when writing to the journal.
Signed-off-by: Jose R. Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao
When the JBD code was forked to create the new JBD2 code base, the
references to CONFIG_JBD_DEBUG where never changed to
CONFIG_JBD2_DEBUG. This patch fixes that.
Signed-off-by: Jose R. Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4/fs/jbd2/journal.c
On Jun 07, 2007 23:45 -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote:
The jbd2-debug file used to be located in /proc/sys/fs/jbd2-debug, but
create_proc_entry() does not do lookups on file names with more that one
directory deep. This causes the entry creation to fail and hence, no proc
file is created.
PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
This patch converts the 32-bit i_version in the generic inode to a 64-bit
i_version field.
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Jean Noel Cordenner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.21/include/linux/fs.h
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4/fs/ext4/inode.c
===
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4.orig/fs/ext4/inode.c 2007-06-14 17:32:27.0
-0700
Journal checksum feature has been added to detect corruption of journal.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Girish Shilamkar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -Nurp linux024/fs/ext4/super.c linux/fs/ext4/super.c
---
Use zero_user_page() in ext4 where possible.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/fs/ext4/inode.c
===
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2.orig/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@
Subject: ext4: remove extra IS_RDONLY() check
From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ext4_change_inode_journal_flag() is only called from one location:
ext4_ioctl(EXT3_IOC_SETFLAGS). That ioctl case already has a IS_RDONLY()
call in it so this one is superfluous.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen [EMAIL
From: Dmitry Monakhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ext4: extent compilation fixes
Fix compilation with EXT_DEBUG, also fix leXX_to_cpu convertions.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Alex Tomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
From: Dmitry Monakhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ext4: extent macros cleanup
- Replace math equation to it's macro equivalent
- make ext4_ext_grow_indepth() indexes/leaf correct
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Alex Tomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp
, 2007-07-01 at 03:37 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote:
This patch converts the 32-bit i_version in the generic inode to a 64-bit
i_version field.
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Jean Noel Cordenner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 15:58 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 03:36 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote:
+
+#define EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(xtime, inode, raw_inode)
\
+do
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 16:53 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Jul 06, 2007 09:51 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
The use of a mount option means the change attribute could be
inconsistent across mounts. If we really need this, wouldn't it make
more sense for it to be a persistent feature of
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:35:48 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add a mount option to turn off extents.
Please update the changelog to describe the reason for making this change.
Sure, I will update the changelog
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:32 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Set the journals JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT on devices with more
than 32bit block sizes during mount time. This ensure proper record
lenth when writing
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:01 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Turn on extents feature by default in ext4 filesystem. User could use
-o noextents to turn it off.
Oh, there you go.
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4/fs/ext4
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:37:04 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch converts the 32-bit i_version in the generic inode to a 64-bit
i_version field.
That's obvious from the patch. But what was the reason
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 18:22 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:09:40 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:37:04 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch converts
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches.
I don't know what the old nanosecond patches are. A link to a suitable
changlog for those patches would
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 13:21 +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
On Tuesday July 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, thanks. It doesn't actually tell us why we want to implement
this attribute and it doesn't tell us what the implications of failing
to do so are, but I guess we can take that on trust
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 21:42 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:21:49 -0400 Cédric Augonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2007/7/10, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
+ size = sizeof(struct transaction_stats_s);
+ s-stats = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 21:22 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:19:16 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 18:22 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:09:40 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 00:38 -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:30:25 -0700
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:48 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 07, 2007 23:45 -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote:
The jbd2-debug file
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 23:35 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 05:35:13PM -0400, Mingming Cao wrote:
Sorry about this. I was using version 0.04. The latest one I can find
for now is 0.05(searching lkml), but it didn't catch this codling style
bug either. I appreciate
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 22:17 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:09:08 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Chinneer pointed that we need to journal the version number
updates together with the operations that causes the change of the inode
version number
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 23:20 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:38:59 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Dmitry Monakhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ext4: extent macros cleanup
- Replace math equation to it's macro equivalent
s/it's/its/;)
Okay
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 12:35 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 09:59 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Kalpak Shah wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 23:18 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:38:51 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: [EXT4 set 9][PATCH 4/5]Morecleanups:ext4_extent_compilation_fixes
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:38:51 -0400
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization
/linux/jbd2.h 2007-06-11 16:35:25.0
-0700
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
* CONFIG_JBD2_DEBUG is on.
*/
#define JBD_EXPENSIVE_CHECKING
JBD2?
Some cleanups in ext4/JBD2 to follow the naming fules:change micros name
from JBD_XXX to JBD2_XXX.
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:22 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with the patch all headers are checked. the code should become
more resistant to on-disk corruptions. needless BUG_ON() have
been removed. please, review
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 19:31 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:38:10 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[PATCH] jbd2 stats through procfs
The patch below updates the jbd stats patch to 2.6.20/jbd2.
The initial patch was posted by Alex Tomas in December 2005
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 21:42 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:21:49 -0400 Cédric Augonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2007/7/10, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
+ size = sizeof(struct transaction_stats_s);
+ s-stats = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
isize
patch.
Fixing memory allocation issue with expand inode extra isize patch.
- use GFP_NOFS instead of GFP_KERNEL flag for memory allocation
- use kzalloc instead of kmalloc
- fix memory leak in the success case, at the end of while loop.
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
fs
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 18:06 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Jul 16, 2007 16:52 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
I am not sure why we need GFP_KERNEL flag here. I think we should use
GFP_NOFS instead. The following patch use the GFP_NOFS flag, as well as
fixing memory leak issue introduced
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches.
I don't know what the old nanosecond patches are. A link to a suitable
changlog for those patches would
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 15:29 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 17:49 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+static inline __le32 ext4_encode_extra_time
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 17:37 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
It seems jbd_debug() might need modification:
fs/ext4/inode.c: In function ‘ext4_write_inode’:
fs/ext4/inode.c:2906: warning: comparison is always true due to limited
range of data type
fs/jbd2/recovery.c: In function
to 0. But this is not the case.
The fix is change the level of debugging to 1. The same should fixed in
ext3/JBD, but currently ext3 jbd-debug via /proc fs is broken, so we
probably should fix it all together.
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
fs/ext4/inode.c|2 +-
fs
-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6.22/fs/ext4/extents.c
===
--- linux-2.6.22.orig/fs/ext4/extents.c 2007-07-27 08:31:02.0 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.22/fs/ext4/extents.c 2007-07-27 08:31:48.0 -0700
@@ -1544,7
On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 20:24 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 11:30:36AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
Sigh, we HAVE a patch that was only adding delalloc to ext4, but it
was rejected because that functionality should go into the VFS.
Since the performance improvement
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 12:34 +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 17:16 +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote:
I will make the changes and send an incremental patch.
Hi,
I have made the changes and attached the incremental patch as per the
review.
Thanks,
I merged your
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 17:47 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
Just rebase to 2.6.23-rc4 and against the ext4 patch queue. Compile tested
only.
Next steps:
Need a e2fsprogs changes to able test this feature. As mkfs needs to be
educated not assuming rec_len to be blocksize all the time
The blocks per page could be less or quals to 1 with the large block support in
VM.
The patch fixed the way to calculate the number of blocks to reserve in journal
in the
case blocksize pagesize.
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: my2.6/fs/jbd/journal.c
.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
fs/jbd/checkpoint.c |2
fs/jbd/commit.c |6 +-
fs/jbd/journal.c | 107 -
fs/jbd/transaction.c | 10 ++--
fs/jbd2
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 11:53 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
jbd/jbd2: Replace slab allocations with page cache allocations
From: Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JBD should not pass slab pages down to the block layer.
Use page allocator pages instead. This will also prepare
JBD
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 15:01 -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 12:29 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 11:53 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
jbd/jbd2: Replace slab allocations with page cache allocations
From: Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JBD
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 10:04 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 03:57:31PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
Here is the incremental small cleanup patch.
Remove kamlloc usages in jbd/jbd2 and consistently use
jbd_kmalloc/jbd2_malloc.
Shouldn't we kill jbd_kmalloc
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 13:04 -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 09:35 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 10:04 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 03:57:31PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
Here is the incremental small cleanup patch
Convert the GFP_KERNEL flag used in JBD/JBD2 to GFP_NOFS, consistent
with the rest of kmalloc flag used in the JBD/JBD2 layer.
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
fs/jbd/journal.c |6 +++---
fs/jbd/revoke.c |8
fs/jbd2/journal.c |6 +++---
fs/jbd2/revoke.c
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 19:28 +, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 14:26 -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 12:15 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
Here is the patch to clean up __GFP_NOFAIL flag in jbd/jbd2. In all
cases except one handles memory allocation failure
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 14:34 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:22:09 -0700
Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Convert the GFP_KERNEL flag used in JBD/JBD2 to GFP_NOFS, consistent
with the rest of kmalloc flag used in the JBD/JBD2 layer.
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 16:30 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
Attached the fixes necessary to support 64k pagesize/blocksize. I think these
are useful
independent of the large blocksize patchset since there are architectures
that support
64k page size and that could use these large buffer
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 17:08 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Mingming Cao wrote:
[PATCH] jbd2 stats through procfs
The patch below updates the jbd stats patch to 2.6.20/jbd2.
The initial patch was posted by Alex Tomas in December 2005
(http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4m=113538565128617w=2
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 20:33 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
plain text document attachment (ext4_opts.patch)
From: Miklos Szeredi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Add stripe= option to /proc/mounts for ext4 filesystems.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Index: linux/fs/ext4/super.c
82 matches
Mail list logo
