f-by: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
This looks good from a GFS2 point of view:
Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Wendy Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Steve.
>
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/gfs2/ops_export.c
> ==
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 19:42 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I was looking into cleaning up the the read actor mess now that sendfile
> uses splice and notices gfs2 now uses do_generic_mapping_read.
>
> The use is rather odd because it's used for reading small structures
> from kernelspace a
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 05:57:49PM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Fri, 6 July 2007 09:52:14 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 23:42:01 +1000 David Chinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hmmm - I guess you could use it for writeback ordering. I hadn't
> > > really thought a
ign to
> fall back on some other behavior. And I can't see any reason it would
> need to distinguish between those two remaining cases (filesystem
> doesn't support leases, or leases are disabled by the sysctl). So,
> OK, EINVAL sounds fine to me.
>
> But I don't ha
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 09:35 -0700, Marc Eshel wrote:
> This is the return code that setlease() currently returns when the lease
> can not be obtained. Although ENOTSUPP would be more accurately describing
> the error it will be a new return code from setlease() that is currently
> not expec
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 18:14 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> From: Marc Eshel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Since gfs2 can't prevent conflicting opens or leases on other nodes, we
> probably shouldn't allow it to give out leases at all.
>
> Put the newly defined lease operation into use in gfs2 by
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 05:13 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:19:55PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > The patch titled
> > fs: introduce write_begin, write_end, and perform_write aops
> > has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
> > fs-introduce-writ
Hi,
Sorry for the delay,
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 19:41 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> From: Marc Eshel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - unquoted
>
> Add NFS lock support to GFS2.
>
> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PR
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 05:36 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:13:29PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
[some comments snipped]
> > Attached is a quick patch to hook up the existing ocfs2 write code. This has
> > been compile tested only for now - one of my test machines isn't
> >
Hi,
Now in the GFS2 -nmw git tree. Thanks,
Steve.
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 14:30 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Indent help text as expected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> fs/dlm/Kconfig | 16
> fs/gfs2/Kc
Hi,
Now in the GFS2 -nmw git tree. Thanks,
Steve.
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 18:42 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> With CONFIG_DLM=m, CONFIG_PROC_FS=n, and CONFIG_SYSFS=n, kernel build
> fails with:
>
> WARNING: "kernel_subsys" [fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/lock_dlm.k
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 21:32 -0600, Russell Cattelan wrote:
> This fixes a bug found by the fsfuzzer tool.
> http://projects.info-pull.com/mokb/MOKB-15-11-2006.html
>
> A NULL was not an acceptable error condition expected
> by any of the gfs2_lookupi callers.
>
Now applied to the GFS2 git t
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 03:39 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Steven Whitehouse wrote:
>
> >>Hmm, doesn't look like we can do this either because at least GFS2
> >>uses BH_New for its own special things.
> >>
> >
> > What makes you say t
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 02:52 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Mark Fasheh wrote:
>
> >> ->commit_write() would probably do fine. Currently, block_prepare_write()
> >> uses it to know which buffers were newly allocated (the file system
> >> specific
> >> get_block_t sets the
Hi,
This looks good to me, and I'm copying in Dave & Wendy who have both
done previous work in this area for further comment. Provided we can get
this tested, I'd be happy to accept the patch in its current form.
Steve.
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 00:34 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> From: J. Bruce F
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 01:48 -0800, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2006 09:04 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > - readdirplus
> >
> > This one is completely unneeded as a kernel API. Doing readdir
> > plus calls on the wire makes a lot of sense and we already do
> > that f
Hi,
I've put this in the -nmw git tree. I'd pull it into the -fixes tree
too, but its probably better to let Linus take whats there first and
then I'll send this on later,
Steve.
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 22:29 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Fix function par
17 matches
Mail list logo
