I think buffer_insert_inode_queue and fsync_inode_buffers need to be
added to ksyms.c for ext2 to compile as a module in later 2.4-ac kernels.
Ben
Richard Gooch wrote:
Hi, Al. I'd like to explore an idea Linus suggested a while back. He
suggested using VFS inodes as the data store for devfs, rather than
keeping stuff in devfs entries. So the idea would be that the VFS
maintains the tree structure rather than devfs entries.
This
Has anyone seen this problem. I have a machine which is using partitions
that are EXT3 w/ Linux V 2.2.5-15. I was performing a mount/unmount of an EXT3
fs. Every thing
was working fine When I got an system hang on the issue of an unmount for
the ext3 fs. The system was rebooted and then I
Alexander Viro writes:
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Richard Gooch wrote:
I'd like to see something more drastic. Indeed, that union crap is by
far the worst offender and needs fixing. But there's a whole pile of
other junk that's just not needed all the time.
Richard, may I remind you that
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Richard Gooch wrote:
I'd like to see something more drastic. Indeed, that union crap is by
far the worst offender and needs fixing. But there's a whole pile of
other junk that's just not needed all the time.
Richard, may I remind you that we are supposed to be in the
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Richard Gooch wrote:
Yes. And all that time mounting the thing at several point was a huge,
fscking hole.
Sure. And hence RedHat wasn't going to compile it in.
Fine with RedHat, but how in hell does it solve the problem? I don't
_CARE_ for any "party line". I don't
Alexander Viro writes:
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Richard Gooch wrote:
Yes. And all that time mounting the thing at several point was a huge,
fscking hole.
Sure. And hence RedHat wasn't going to compile it in.
Fine with RedHat, but how in hell does it solve the problem? I don't
