Re: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount...

2000-05-16 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 15 May 00 at 22:00, Alexander Viro wrote: On Mon, 15 May 2000, Petr Vandrovec wrote: Hi Al, during last week I decided that I should retry my attempt to add NCP sessions support into kernel. My last attempts through adding NCP protocol family ended in some troubles because of

VFS: Busy inodes after unmount...

2000-05-15 Thread Petr Vandrovec
Hi Al, during last week I decided that I should retry my attempt to add NCP sessions support into kernel. My last attempts through adding NCP protocol family ended in some troubles because of connection to NDS requires connections to couple of Netware servers. So for now I decided to make

Re: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount...

2000-05-15 Thread Alexander Viro
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Mon, 15 May 2000, Alexander Viro wrote: And then there is an issue with multiple mounts - which ones should be affected by such policy? All of them? The last one? Linus, could you elaborate on that - what do you actually want here?

Re: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount...

2000-05-15 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
On 15-May-2000 Linus Torvalds wrote: Hmm.. What about autofs4? I think it uses the same ramfs method. So yes, it sounds like a common support routine to have. Nice to have, but generally the daemon does all the cleanup anyway. It would only be used in the case where a catatonic autofs4

Re: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount...

2000-05-15 Thread Alexander Viro
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Petr Vandrovec wrote: Hi Al, during last week I decided that I should retry my attempt to add NCP sessions support into kernel. My last attempts through adding NCP protocol family ended in some troubles because of connection to NDS requires connections to couple of