On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 10:47:46PM -0800, Marc Eshel wrote:
Here is a rewrite of gdlm_plock_callback(). We still need to add the
lock cancel.
Marc.
int gdlm_plock_callback(struct plock_op *op)
{
struct file *file;
struct file_lock *fl;
int (*notify)(void *, void *, int) =
Hi,
This looks good to me, and I'm copying in Dave Wendy who have both
done previous work in this area for further comment. Provided we can get
this tested, I'd be happy to accept the patch in its current form.
Steve.
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 00:34 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
From: J. Bruce
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 12:34:20AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
+int gdlm_plock_callback(struct plock_op *op)
+{
+ struct file *file;
+ struct file_lock *fl;
+ int rv;
+
+ spin_lock(ops_lock);
+ if (!list_empty(op-list)) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO plock op on
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 09:49:51AM -0600, David Teigland wrote:
The gfs side looks fine to me. Did you forget to call fl_notify from
gdlm_plock_callback() or am I missing something?
Yes, looks like we missed something, thanks. This code's an rfc (not
even tested), so don't apply it yet! What
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 02:57:22PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 09:49:51AM -0600, David Teigland wrote:
The gfs side looks fine to me. Did you forget to call fl_notify from
gdlm_plock_callback() or am I missing something?
Yes, looks like we missed something,
Here is a rewrite of gdlm_plock_callback(). We still need to add the
lock cancel.
Marc.
int gdlm_plock_callback(struct plock_op *op)
{
struct file *file;
struct file_lock *fl;
int (*notify)(void *, void *, int) = NULL;
int rv;
spin_lock(ops_lock);
if
