Hi,
I am using:
heartbeat-3.0.0-33.2
pacemaker-mgmt-client-1.99.2-6.1
pacemaker-libs-1.0.5-4.1
pacemaker-1.0.5-4.1
pacemaker-mgmt-1.99.2-6.1
/etc/init.d/heartbeat stop hangs in /usr/lib/heartbeat/heartbeat -k
strace output on this shows it is waiting on its child to exit.., which are
inturn waiti
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
>
> Wow don't scare me, man! So far my golden rule is: Don't fix it if
> it's not broken. But, I'm required to update my machine if there's
> security high-vuln.
> Decision.. decision... ^^
It's OK when you know. I didn't notice until after the upgrade and
reboot of both no
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> We have a netapp fas2020: it's expensive, not open-sores or lignux
> based, but compared to heartbeat/drbd it can easily be cheap at the
> price. Especially if you come to work one Sunday afternoon to run "yum
> update" on the fileservers and
Igor Chudov wrote:
> Florian, it is very possible that I overlooked some valuable
> documentation. It is also possible that things have improved since I
> tried it last summer.
Having gone through the exercise recently: not really, no. Old-style
configs still work as of 3.0.3, though.
> However,
I've spent the last several months learning drbd, pacemaker etc ... drbd itself
is surprisingly simple to get up running. Im yet to experience significant
problems with it.
Pacemaker has documentation, but I've certainly found it a tad difficult to
locate, in the initial days at least of start
Florian, it is very possible that I overlooked some valuable
documentation. It is also possible that things have improved since I
tried it last summer.
However, at present, my question was to locate and consider
alternatives to drbd and heartbeat.
I will peruse the links that you provided, as, pr
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Igor Chudov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Igor Chudov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
Taking into account "simple" the answer is no. You can try RedHat
>
On 12/08/2010 08:39 PM, Igor Chudov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
>> Taking into account "simple" the answer is no. You can try RedHat
>> Cluster Suite on CentOS, but that's not simple.
>>
>> What's wrong with DRBD/Pacemaker/Corosync ?
>
> DRBD/Pacemaker was comp
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Igor Chudov wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
>>> Taking into account "simple" the answer is no. You can try RedHat
>>> Cluster Suite on CentOS, but that's not simple.
>>>
>>>
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Igor Chudov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
>> Taking into account "simple" the answer is no. You can try RedHat
>> Cluster Suite on CentOS, but that's not simple.
>>
>> What's wrong with DRBD/Pacemaker/Corosync ?
>
> DRBD/Pacemaker
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
> Taking into account "simple" the answer is no. You can try RedHat
> Cluster Suite on CentOS, but that's not simple.
>
> What's wrong with DRBD/Pacemaker/Corosync ?
DRBD/Pacemaker was complicated, documentation did not exist or did not
match
Taking into account "simple" the answer is no. You can try RedHat
Cluster Suite on CentOS, but that's not simple.
What's wrong with DRBD/Pacemaker/Corosync ?
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Igor Chudov wrote:
> I am interested in finding out Open Source alternative that would
> replace both DRB
I am interested in finding out Open Source alternative that would
replace both DRBD as well as Heartbeat. I am definitely NOT looking
for pacemaker either.
I am looking for something simple, just file serving ability and
switching NFS and samba would be all I need.
igor
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:
The question is too broad. Are you interested in Open Source or
proprietary product? What do you want to achieve?
One of the answers could be AoE (ATA over Ethernet) + OCFS2.
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Igor Chudov wrote:
> I would like to know if there are relatively straightforward Linux
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 19:26:53 Igor Chudov wrote:
> I would like to know if there are relatively straightforward Linux
> based alternatives to DRBD and heartbeat.
>
> Any pointers and suggestions will be gratefully accepted.
Yes. DRBD and pacemaker.
See: www.clusterlabs.org
--
Dr. Micha
I would like to know if there are relatively straightforward Linux
based alternatives to DRBD and heartbeat.
Any pointers and suggestions will be gratefully accepted.
Thanks
i
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Bin Chen(sunwen_ling)
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Bin Chen(sunwen_ling)
>> wrote:
>> > Hi guys,
>> >
>> > My resource some times goes into (unmanaged) state, what I should do if i
>> > encoun
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Alain.Moulle wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> no because I have no lsb script pacemaker installed on RHEL6 with
> my package : pacemaker-1.1.2-2
>
> Does that mean that to configure Option 3, there is a pacemaker release
> minimum
> that is more recent then the 1.1.2-2 ?
Y
Hi Andrew,
no because I have no lsb script pacemaker installed on RHEL6 with
my package : pacemaker-1.1.2-2
Does that mean that to configure Option 3, there is a pacemaker release
minimum
that is more recent then the 1.1.2-2 ?
Thanks
Alain
___
Linux-
On 12/08/2010 10:11 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Linux Cook wrote:
>> hi andrew,
>>
>> dpkg -l |grep corosync
>
> Ah debian, better contact them directly.
> They dont let us be involved in packaging and it looks to me like
> they've messed something up (since stonit
Hello list,
I am testing network failure case by removing nic cable on one node and
getting
unwanted outcomes as whole cluster gets disturbed and resource appears to move
on different nodes until it gets stabled on one node and it is also resulting
in
failback.
Like if i remove nic cable from
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Bin Chen(sunwen_ling)
> wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > My resource some times goes into (unmanaged) state, what I should do if i
> > encounter this?
>
> I'm guessing it failed to stop and you didn't have stonith
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Bart Coninckx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just finished setting up a two-node cluster with pacemaker-1.0.1-20.3.x86_64
> and openais-0.80.3-26.2.x86_64 (OpenSuse 11.2).
1.0.1??? Please get something newer from clusterlabs.org/rpm
> I seem to have quite irradicate (or so I p
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Bin Chen(sunwen_ling)
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> My resource some times goes into (unmanaged) state, what I should do if i
> encounter this?
I'm guessing it failed to stop and you didn't have stonith configured.
But you didn't include anything that would allow us to com
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Linux Cook wrote:
> hi andrew,
>
> dpkg -l |grep corosync
Ah debian, better contact them directly.
They dont let us be involved in packaging and it looks to me like
they've messed something up (since stonithd can't start)
> ii corosync
25 matches
Mail list logo
