On 2010-12-06 19:20, Alan Robertson wrote:
On 12/06/2010 09:35 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On a different matter:
Perhaps it would be good to add a section about ocf-tester. Or
would you consider that out of scope?
Let me second that request. If you don't know about ocf-tester, then
On 2010-12-07 02:33, Tim Serong wrote:
On a different matter:
Perhaps it would be good to add a section about ocf-tester. Or
would you consider that out of scope?
Speaking of out-of-scope... A question came up the other day on
#linux-cluster about if there's any documentation for
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Florian Haas florian.h...@linbit.com wrote:
On 2010-12-08 18:15, alexander.kra...@basf.com wrote:
Hi Florian,
Section 5.10:
The variables are missing a notify. It is:
OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_notify_start_uname
not
OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_start_uname
Thanks!
No Section:
Is there a reason, why the environment variable
'OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_role', which is set in the monitor action,
isn't mentioned anywhere ?
Make a good case for it to be explained, and convince me that it won't
just serve to confuse everybody, and I'll include it. My
No Section:
Is there a reason, why the environment variable
'OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_role', which is set in the monitor action,
isn't mentioned anywhere ?
Make a good case for it to be explained, and convince me that it
won't
just serve to confuse everybody, and I'll include it.
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu wrote:
On 12/9/2010 4:05 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Igor Chudovichu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Serge Dubrouskiserge...@gmail.com wrote:
Taking into account simple the
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Bart Coninckx bart.conin...@telenet.be wrote:
On Thursday 09 December 2010 22:21:57 Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 9 December 2010 17:09, Igor Chudov ichu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu
wrote:
See LRM
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Alain.Moulle alain.mou...@bull.net wrote:
Hi,
Thanks.
So I have a robustness pb with Pacemaker/corosync ... you'll tell me
if it seems normal or not , if I miss something or not :
Perfectly valid testcase, unacceptable result.
Perhaps try with
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Bart Pousson
bartpous...@tango-networks.com wrote:
Thanks for the response,
I did do a Google search on both logs before posting to this mailing list.
This is what has been tried so far:
1. Several times the service was stopped and started using
Oh, and 2.1.4???
Unless you're on SLES10, please update to a recent Pacemaker version.
Not that this will solve this particular problem, you'll just be
happier with the result.
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Bart Pousson
bartpous...@tango-networks.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a system with two nodes
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 03:36:05AM +, Preeti Jain wrote:
Hello list,
I am testing network failure case by removing nic cable on one node and
getting
unwanted outcomes as whole cluster gets disturbed and resource appears to
move
on different nodes until it gets stabled on one node
I've moved a little bit further with running linux ha suite on freebsd, few
more problems though:
1. crm node standby/online is not working
issuing following command has no effect and node remains online/standby
[r...@alice ~]# crm node standby alice.local reboot
scope=nodes name=standby
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Igor Chudov wrote:
I would like to know if there are relatively straightforward Linux
based alternatives to DRBD and heartbeat.
It occurs to me that I've yet to see an actual answer to the original
poster's question. I've seen lots of dicussion
Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenberg at linbit.com writes:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 03:36:05AM +, Preeti Jain wrote:
Hello list,
I am testing network failure case by removing nic cable on one node and
getting
unwanted outcomes as whole cluster gets disturbed and resource appears to
move
The issue has been resolved - somewhat. I'll share what I know in case
it helps anyone else.
To troubleshoot the problem, the mcast address in the ha.cf file was
commented out and that allowed heartbeat processes to at least come up.
That isolated the issue as an mcast address issue.
The
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:28:06PM +, Preeti Jain wrote:
Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenberg at linbit.com writes:
I will try to implement as you suggested,
but is there any other way like any parameter in ha.cf or in cib to avoid
this
problem.
Like we have Pingd resource agent for fail
Hi,
I am successfully running HA SMTP server with two nodes on IPv4, but now
I want to add support for IPv6 migration between the nodes. What will be
right format of line in haresources for one resource (postfix)? I am
running heartbeat version 3.0.3.
Currently I have line:
smtp-1 10.0.0.1
On 12/10/10 2:20 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
See LRM operation WebSite_start_0 unknown error from November, that's
where your pdf led me. By the time I hit unknown error starting drbd
resource -- set up exactly as you describe, I've spent close to a week
trying to replicate the setup that takes
This does not at all back up your claim that there is no documentation.
All this shows is that EPEL5 (what you tried it on) is different from
Fedora-13 (what the guide was written for).
Who would use fedora for anything that needed a highly available server?
I would not, as a former
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Igor Chudov ichu...@gmail.com wrote:
This does not at all back up your claim that there is no documentation.
All this shows is that EPEL5 (what you tried it on) is different from
Fedora-13 (what the guide was written for).
Who would use fedora for
On 12/10/10 8:32 AM, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Igor Chudovichu...@gmail.com wrote:
This does not at all back up your claim that there is no documentation.
All this shows is that EPEL5 (what you tried it on) is different from
Fedora-13 (what the guide was written
Hi folks,
I'm trying to build a failover solution using FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE and Heartbeat
from ports (v2.1.4-10).
I've already configured heartbeat in the two peers, but once I start the daemon
using the /usr/local/etc/rc.d/heartbeat script, either CRM and CIB fail to
start.
I've already
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/10 2:20 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
See LRM operation WebSite_start_0 unknown error from November, that's
where your pdf led me. By the time I hit unknown error starting drbd
resource -- set up exactly as you
On 12/10/2010 9:27 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/10 2:20 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
See LRM operation WebSite_start_0 unknown error from November, that's
where your pdf led me. By the time I hit unknown error
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/2010 9:27 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/10 2:20 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
See LRM operation WebSite_start_0 unknown error from
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/10 8:32 AM, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Igor Chudovichu...@gmail.com wrote:
This does not at all back up your claim that there is no documentation.
All
On 12/10/2010 11:30 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
No-one is suggesting all clusters should run on Fedora. I was clearly
trying to say that instructions for A are unlikely to work unmodified
for B.
So perhaps the appropriate question would be where to find the
instructions for B - or a platform
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/2010 11:30 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
No-one is suggesting all clusters should run on Fedora. I was clearly
trying to say that instructions for A are unlikely to work unmodified
for B.
So perhaps the
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 02:52:16PM +0100, Lumir Jasiok wrote:
Hi,
I am successfully running HA SMTP server with two nodes on IPv4, but now
I want to add support for IPv6 migration between the nodes. What will be
right format of line in haresources for one resource (postfix)? I am
running
Les Mikesell wrote:
...
What I
wanted was advice on the best platform that had a packaged, re-usable
setup available that was likely to be maintained in updates for a long
time.
There's a bit of problem with your requirement: you forgot supported.
As in try getting any support here for
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
...
What I
wanted was advice on the best platform that had a packaged, re-usable
setup available that was likely to be maintained in updates for a long
time.
There's a bit of problem with your
On 12/10/2010 1:54 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
...
What I
wanted was advice on the best platform that had a packaged, re-usable
setup available that was likely to be maintained in updates for a long
time.
There's a bit of problem with your requirement: you forgot
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/2010 1:54 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
...
What I
wanted was advice on the best platform that had a packaged, re-usable
setup available that was likely to be maintained in updates for a long
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/2010 2:29 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
What I
wanted was advice on the best platform that had a packaged, re-usable
setup available that was likely to be maintained in updates for a long
time.
There's a bit
Serge Dubrouski wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Dimitri Maziuk dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu
wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
...
What I
wanted was advice on the best platform that had a packaged, re-usable
setup available that was likely to be maintained in updates for a long
time.
There's a
On 12/10/2010 2:06 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
What's wrong with RHEL5? You can use packages from
http://www.clusterlabs.org/rpm
Yes they don't support dual-master filesystem with OCFS2, but do you
really need it?
BTW, packaging for RHEL5 really sucks. Lots of things are really
outdated and
36 matches
Mail list logo
