Correct me if I'm wrong but I strongly think the following would work:
Since you want to _start_ pacemaker in unmanaged mode, I expect all your
nodes to be offline. Then delete cib.xml on all nodes but one.
On the one remaining, edit cib.xml and put your configuration
is_managed=false there.
The
Ubuntu has a high-aviablity team ppa out there.
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ha/+archive/ppa
That's what i'm using on some of our production servers and it seems
quite stable.
On 5/10/2011 08:12, Chetan Sarva wrote:
Hi,
It seems that the version of Pacemaker on Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid) is
stil
Hi,
It seems that the version of Pacemaker on Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid) is
still quite old at 1.0.8 and even Debian unstable is only at 1.0.10.
I've had stability issues with both versions (high cpu usage,
flapping) so I'm considering either manually compiling the latest
1.1.x series on Ubuntu or movin
I don't think it is authorized at all, we must never "write" directly
in cib.xml , I tried for other needs and it systematically disturbs
Pacemaker a lot !
We always have to go through some crm commands or similar
(crm_attributes, etc.)
but they are not taken in account before the 60s are ended.
Just write it to the xml on all nodes?
On 05/10/2011 01:23 PM, Alain.Moulle wrote:
> Sorry I meant "directly with is_managed=false" of course !
> Alain
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux
Sorry I meant "directly with is_managed=false" of course !
Alain
> Hi
>
> I wonder if there is a way to start Pacemaker but directly in the mode
> is_managed=true,
> so that at the start , none action on any resource configured in
> Pacemaker will be executed (start, stop, monitoring etc.)
>
> Th
Hi
I wonder if there is a way to start Pacemaker but directly in the mode
is_managed=true,
so that at the start , none action on any resource configured in
Pacemaker will be executed (start, stop, monitoring etc.)
This would useful in the case we have a big problem which makes all
resources fa
Hi!
I wonder: Are you trying to create a snapshot of a VG that is activated on
another node? A snapsot modifies the data blocks of the original VG, so I'd be
not surprised if the kernel crashes then.
Regards,
Ulrich
>>> Brent Clark 06.05.11 11.44 Uhr >>>
Hiya
Im wondering if someone could sh
