[Linux-ha-dev] [patch] conntrackd RA

2011-08-18 Thread Albéric de Pertat
Hi, While playing with the conntrackd agent on Debian Squeeze, I found out the method used in the monitor action is not accurate and can sometimes yield false results, believing conntrackd is running when it is not. I am instead checking the existence of the control socket and it has so far

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [patch] conntrackd RA

2011-08-18 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:28:44PM +0200, Albéric de Pertat wrote: Hi, While playing with the conntrackd agent on Debian Squeeze, I found out the method used in the monitor action is not accurate and can sometimes yield false results, believing conntrackd is running when it is not. As in

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [patch] conntrackd RA

2011-08-18 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:58:21PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote: On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:28:44PM +0200, Albéric de Pertat wrote: Hi, While playing with the conntrackd agent on Debian Squeeze, I found out the method used in the monitor action is not accurate and can sometimes yield

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [patch] conntrackd RA

2011-08-18 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:24:04PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote: On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:58:21PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote: On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:28:44PM +0200, Albéric de Pertat wrote: Hi, While playing with the conntrackd agent on Debian Squeeze, I found out the

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] OCF RA for named

2011-08-18 Thread Serge Dubrouski
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenb...@linbit.comwrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 08:51:04AM -0600, Serge Dubrouski wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic de...@suse.de wrote: Hi Serge, On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 08:19:52AM -0600, Serge

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [patch] conntrackd RA

2011-08-18 Thread Albéric de Pertat
Le jeudi 18 août 2011 13:43:20, Lars Ellenberg a écrit : So yes, your patch is good. Acked-by lars ;-) Oh thanks :) Oh, these monologues... --- conntrackd 2011-08-18 12:12:36.807562142 +0200 +++ /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/conntrackd2011-08-18 12:25:20.0

[Linux-HA] Q: crm shell: things more complex than group

2011-08-18 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi! Reading the docs, I learned that pacemaker understands more complex dependencies than group where resources are strictly sequential. For example one could start a set of resources in parallel, then wait until all are done, then start another set of resources, etc. Now I wonder: 1) Can

[Linux-HA] Forcing primitive_nfslock away from node

2011-08-18 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
WTH does this mean (from node2): pengine: [16069]: notice: clone_print: Master/Slave Set: master_drbd pengine: [16069]: notice: short_print: Masters: [ node1 ] pengine: [16069]: notice: short_print: Slaves: [ node2 ] pengine: [16069]: notice: native_print: