Hi
1.slapd-001.patch
When there is not PID file, I add the error log output.
2.slapd-002.patch
Bug correction of the while sentence.
3.slapd-003.patch
Spelling miscorrection of the return code.
Regards,
Tomo
slapd-001.patch
Description: Binary data
slapd-002.patch
Description: Binary
Gao,Yan y...@suse.com schrieb am 01.12.2011 um 06:55 in Nachricht
4ed716be.9090...@suse.com:
Hi,
On 11/30/11 21:35, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Hi!
Simple question: when is the attribute cib-last-written in XML's cib
element updated?
When //cib/configuration is changed.
So why isn't that
OK,
I read 9.5. Reloading Services After a Definition Change.So the filesystem RA
lacks a reload operation. However even when having a reload operation, not
all parameter changes can be done via a reload; some need a real restart.
Now the confusing thing comes into play: Why can't a unique
On 12/01/11 16:10, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Gao,Yan y...@suse.com schrieb am 01.12.2011 um 06:55 in Nachricht
4ed716be.9090...@suse.com:
Hi,
On 11/30/11 21:35, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Hi!
Simple question: when is the attribute cib-last-written in XML's cib
element updated?
When
On 12/01/2011 09:10 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Gao,Yany...@suse.com schrieb am 01.12.2011 um 06:55 in Nachricht
4ed716be.9090...@suse.com:
Hi,
On 11/30/11 21:35, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Hi!
Simple question: when is the attribute cib-last-written in XML's cib
element updated?
When
Andreas Kurz andr...@hastexo.com schrieb am 30.11.2011 um 14:54 in
Nachricht
4ed6357a.5040...@hastexo.com:
On 11/30/2011 12:58 PM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Hi,
when changing the performce-related-only mount option for a filesystem I
noticed that the LRM decided to restart the resource and
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:37:57AM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm schrieb am 30.11.2011 um 15:35 in
Nachricht 2030143512.GB6964@walrus.homenet:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 02:56:34PM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Hi!
It seems the
Tim Serong tser...@suse.com schrieb am 01.12.2011 um 10:19 in Nachricht
4ed74691.9000...@suse.com:
On 12/01/2011 09:10 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Gao,Yany...@suse.com schrieb am 01.12.2011 um 06:55 in Nachricht
4ed716be.9090...@suse.com:
Hi,
On 11/30/11 21:35, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Hi!
Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm schrieb am 01.12.2011 um 11:16 in
Nachricht 20111201101646.GA11310@walrus.homenet:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:37:57AM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
[...]
So what are you doing here?
I'm not sure :) You seem to be very proficient at programming,
Hi Everyone,
I'm in the process of configuring a 2 node + DRBD enabled DHCP cluster
using the following packages:
SLES 11 SP1, with Pacemaker 1.1.6, corosync 1.4.2, and drbd 8.3.12.
I know about DHCP's internal fail-over abilities, but after testing, it
simply failed to remain viable as a more
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 13:25 -0400, Chris Bowlby wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I'm in the process of configuring a 2 node + DRBD enabled DHCP cluster
This doesn't really address your specific question, but I got dhcpd to
work by using the ocf:heartbeat:anything RA.
primitive dhcp
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Nick Khamis sym...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the latest version of the RAs have all the old
heartbeat related material removed?
I don't follow. Care to clarify the question?
Florian
--
Need help with High Availability?
http://www.hastexo.com/now
On 11/30/2011 02:06 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2011-11-29T12:36:39, Dimitri Maziukdmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu wrote:
If you repeatedly try to re-sync with a dying disk, with each resync
interrupted by i/o error, you will get data corruption sooner or later.
No, you shouldn't. (Unless the
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 03:57:19PM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Florian Haas flor...@hastexo.com schrieb am 28.11.2011 um 15:05 in
Nachricht
capuexz9bm3suof0fteqvbjcpyo9rlz9gazk3mc5td8oyosi...@mail.gmail.com:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm
wrote:
Hello Chris,
On 12/01/2011 06:25 PM, Chris Bowlby wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I'm in the process of configuring a 2 node + DRBD enabled DHCP cluster
using the following packages:
SLES 11 SP1, with Pacemaker 1.1.6, corosync 1.4.2, and drbd 8.3.12.
I know about DHCP's internal fail-over
Hi Yan,
Hi Andrew,
I confirmed movement in combination with Pacemaker1.0.12 in a repository of
your test.
* https://github.com/gao-yan/pacemaker-mgmt/commits/2.0-test
On my test, both SNMP and GUI worked without a problem.
Please release the contents of this repository as GUI for
16 matches
Mail list logo