Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: beating a dead horse: cLVM, OCFS2 and TOTEM

2013-07-12 Thread Wengatz Herbert
Seeing the high dropping quote... (just compare this to the other NIC) - have you tried a new cable? Maybe it's a cheap hardware problem... -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org [mailto:linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org] Im Auftrag von Lars Marowsky-Bree

[Linux-HA] crm resource restart is broken (d4de3af6dd33)

2013-07-12 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
Hi Dejan, It seems like resource restart does not work any longer. # crm resource restart test01-vm INFO: ordering test01-vm to stop Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/sbin/crm, line 44, in module main.run() File /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/crmsh/main.py, line 442, in

Re: [Linux-HA] crm resource restart is broken (d4de3af6dd33)

2013-07-12 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
12.07.2013 12:06, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: Hi Dejan, It seems like resource restart does not work any longer. Ah, this seems to be fixed by bb39cce17f20. Sorry for noise. ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: beating a dead horse: cLVM, OCFS2 and TOTEM

2013-07-12 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2013-07-12T11:05:32, Wengatz Herbert herbert.weng...@baaderbank.de wrote: Seeing the high dropping quote... (just compare this to the other NIC) - have you tried a new cable? Maybe it's a cheap hardware problem... The drop rate is normal. A slave NIC in a bonded active/passive

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: beating a dead horse: cLVM, OCFS2 and TOTEM

2013-07-12 Thread Wengatz Herbert
Hmmm. Please correct me, if I'm wrong: As I understand it, you have a number of packets, that go to BOTH NICs. Depending, on which one is the active or the passive one, the sum of all dropped packets should be equal to the number of received packets (plusminus some drops for other reasons). So

Re: [Linux-HA] crm resource restart is broken (d4de3af6dd33)

2013-07-12 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:08:12PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: 12.07.2013 12:06, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: Hi Dejan, It seems like resource restart does not work any longer. Yes, I still wonder how did that one slip. Ah, this seems to be fixed by bb39cce17f20. Sorry for noise.

[Linux-HA] Antw: crm resource restart is broken (d4de3af6dd33)

2013-07-12 Thread Ulrich Windl
Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com schrieb am 12.07.2013 um 11:06 in Nachricht 51dfc715.2030...@hoster-ok.com: Hi Dejan, It seems like resource restart does not work any longer. BTW: The way resource restart is implemented (i.e.: stop wait, then start) has a major problem: If stop

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: beating a dead horse: cLVM, OCFS2 and TOTEM

2013-07-12 Thread Ulrich Windl
Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com schrieb am 12.07.2013 um 11:08 in Nachricht 20130712090853.gm19...@suse.de: On 2013-07-12T11:05:32, Wengatz Herbert herbert.weng...@baaderbank.de wrote: Seeing the high dropping quote... (just compare this to the other NIC) - have you tried a new cable?

Re: [Linux-HA] crm node delete

2013-07-12 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
01.07.2013 17:29, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: Hi, I'm trying to look if it is now safe to delete non-running nodes (corosync 2.3, pacemaker HEAD, crmsh tip). # crm node delete v02-d WARNING: 2: crm_node bad format: 7 v02-c WARNING: 2: crm_node bad format: 8 v02-d WARNING: 2: crm_node bad

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: crm resource restart is broken (d4de3af6dd33)

2013-07-12 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2013-07-12T12:19:40, Ulrich Windl ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de wrote: BTW: The way resource restart is implemented (i.e.: stop wait, then start) has a major problem: If stop causes to fence the node where the crm command is running, the resource will remain stopped even after the

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: beating a dead horse: cLVM, OCFS2 and TOTEM (dropped packets on binding device)

2013-07-12 Thread Ulrich Windl
Wengatz Herbert herbert.weng...@baaderbank.de schrieb am 12.07.2013 um 11:19 in Nachricht e0a8d3556d452c42977202b2d60934660431fae...@msx2.baag: Hmmm. Please correct me, if I'm wrong: As I understand it, you have a number of packets, that go to BOTH NICs. Depending, on which one is the

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: crm resource restart is broken (d4de3af6dd33)

2013-07-12 Thread Ulrich Windl
Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com schrieb am 12.07.2013 um 12:23 in Nachricht 20130712102340.go19...@suse.de: On 2013-07-12T12:19:40, Ulrich Windl ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de wrote: BTW: The way resource restart is implemented (i.e.: stop wait, then start) has a major problem: If

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: crm resource restart is broken (d4de3af6dd33)

2013-07-12 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2013-07-12T12:26:18, Ulrich Windl ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de wrote: (Another way to trigger a restart is to modify the instance parameters. Set __manual_restart=1 and it'll restart.) once? ;-) Keep increasing it. ;-) -- Architect Storage/HA SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff

Re: [Linux-HA] crm node delete

2013-07-12 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 12/07/2013, at 8:23 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote: 01.07.2013 17:29, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: Hi, I'm trying to look if it is now safe to delete non-running nodes (corosync 2.3, pacemaker HEAD, crmsh tip). # crm node delete v02-d WARNING: 2: crm_node bad format:

[Linux-HA] Adding node in advance

2013-07-12 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
Hi, I wanted to add new node into CIB in advance, before it is powered on (to power it on in a standby mode while cl#5169 is not implemented). So, I did == [root@vd01-a tmp]# cat u node $id=4 vd01-d \ attributes standby=on virtualization=true [root@vd01-a tmp]# crm configure load

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: crm resource restart is broken (d4de3af6dd33)

2013-07-12 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 12/07/2013, at 8:23 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote: On 2013-07-12T12:19:40, Ulrich Windl ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de wrote: BTW: The way resource restart is implemented (i.e.: stop wait, then start) has a major problem: If stop causes to fence the node where the crm