>>> Andrew Beekhof schrieb am 09.09.2014 um 00:25 in
>>> Nachricht
:
> On 8 Sep 2014, at 5:19 pm, Ulrich Windl
> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I remember having asked this before, but I'l still missing a good
> explanation:
>>
>> What are the precise semantics of "dampening" (attrd_updater -d)?
>>
As an example, if you're pinging two nodes, and both go away, they
almost certainly won't go appear to go away at the exactly same time -
because of the timing of when the pings occurred. In addition other
machines have similar issues and are even more decoupled from each
other. So, in effect it
On 8 Sep 2014, at 5:19 pm, Ulrich Windl
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I remember having asked this before, but I'l still missing a good explanation:
>
> What are the precise semantics of "dampening" (attrd_updater -d)?
>
> The manual page just says:
> -d, --delay=value
> The time to wa
On 08/09/14 06:30 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
All,
it's been almost 6 years since we had a face to face meeting for all
developers and vendors involved in Linux HA.
I'd like to try and organize a new event and piggy-back with DevConf in
Brno [1].
DevConf will start Friday the 6th of Feb 2015
All,
it's been almost 6 years since we had a face to face meeting for all
developers and vendors involved in Linux HA.
I'd like to try and organize a new event and piggy-back with DevConf in
Brno [1].
DevConf will start Friday the 6th of Feb 2015 in Red Hat Brno offices.
My suggestion would be
Hi!
I remember having asked this before, but I'l still missing a good explanation:
What are the precise semantics of "dampening" (attrd_updater -d)?
The manual page just says:
-d, --delay=value
The time to wait (dampening) in seconds further changes occur
Who is waiting? Wh
Hi!
After option="-I " did not work I had a look into the RA: It's a big
mess!
---
ping_update() {
if have_binary fping; then
fping_check
active=$?
else
ping_check
active=$?
fi
[...]
---
So if the system has an fping (mine has!), the RA uses fping; ot
