Hi,
I have been told that support for DRBD is supposed to be phased out from both
SLES and RHEL in the near future.
Are any of you aware this or is this a false claim?
Yours
--martin
P.S.: Of course support from LINBIT should be available even if SuSE or Redhat
will not support it
linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org
im Auftrag von Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Januar 2015 15:39
An: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] Support for DRDB
On 2015-01-16T11:56:04, EXTERNAL Konold Martin (erfrakon, RtP2/TEF72)
external.martin.kon
Hi,
Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com schrieb am 02.05.2013 um 10:04 in
Nachricht
I wonder how they could fly to the moon without XML ;-)
They used plain assembler!
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
Martin Konold
RtP2/TEF72
Tel. +49(7121)35-3322
Fax +49(7121)35-0
BeQIK
I don't see an open bug for something like this right now.
Are you serious?
It was you who resolved this bug as INVALID in bugzilla
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769292.
And yes: if you want support for SLE, you need a support contract.
That's the business model behind
Hi LMB,
From my experience with SLES11 SP2 (with all current updates) I conclude
that actually nobody is seriously running SP2 without local bugfixes.
That isn't quite true.
No, this is true.
I provided an example which can easily be reproduced with stock SLES 11 SP2 and
stock
Hi,
Martin Konold
# zgrep sscan /var/log/messages-201208*.bz2 |wc -l
76
May I add my statistics:
zgrep sscan messages*bz2 | wc -l
508
Yours,
-- martin
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
Hi,
What I do is evaluation od SLES11 SP2 (we run SP1) now. So testing anything
that's not part of SP2 (plu Updates)
is not planned right now.
I also think when reporting problems here early might get you mentally
prepared when the problem is eventually
reported via official support.
Hi,
For readers oft the archive: This can be caused by insufficient timeouts.
ocf:heartbeat:exportfs needs at least 100s timeout for stopping in
order to work properly
stop timeout is advertised as 10s for exportfs. That's probably too short.
But, do you know why does it take so long
Hi,
I am wondering why migrating a simple nfs resource leads to fencing of the
cluster node.
Running resource-agents-3.9.2-0.25.5 on SLES11-SP2 fully updated.
ocf-tester -n test -o fsid=1 -o directory=/SHARED/nfs/home -o
options=rw,mountpoint -o clientspec=10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 -o
Hi,
I am wondering why migrating a simple nfs resource leads to fencing of the
cluster node.
Still trying to resolve this.
* Your agent does not support the reload action (optional) Tests failed:
/usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/exportfs failed 5 tests
Is there anything wrong with my
-Original Message-
From: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org
[mailto:linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org] On Behalf Of EXTERNAL Konold
Martin (erfrakon, RtP2/TEF72)
Sent: Donnerstag, 12. Juli 2012 10:08
To: 'General Linux-HA mailing list'
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] ocf:heartbeat:exportfs
Jun 29 15:12:07 rt-lxcl9a stonith-ng: [12589]: WARN: parse_host_line:
Could not parse (0 0):
Hmm ... well, if it works ... you can open a support request for your
enterprise server
Pretty sure stonith-ng doesn't produce that one anymore.
It happened with stonith 1.0.9.
Best
Hi,
when a split brain (drbd) happens mount.ocfs2 remains hanging unkillable in
D-state.
rt-lxcl9a:~ # ps aux | grep ocf
root 347 0.0 0.0 10468 740 ?D10:25 0:00
/sbin/mount.ocfs2 /dev/drbd_r0 /SHARED -o rw
root 349 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?S10:25
Hi,
Do you have a stonith configured?
Yes. Though a hanging mount does not cause stonith to become activated.
node rt-lxcl9a \
attributes standby=on
node rt-lxcl9b \
attributes standby=off
primitive dlm ocf:pacemaker:controld \
op monitor interval=60 timeout=60 \
Hi,
thanks for the clarification!
1. Why does crm the two distrinct primitives st-ilo-rt-lxcl9ar and
st-ilo-rt-lxcl9br to have different parameters? Is this an error in
stonith:ipmilan?
yes, this is an error in the metadata of ipmilan ... but you should still be
able to commit that
-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Kurz
Sent: Freitag, 29. Juni 2012 13:06
To: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] WARNING: Resources violate uniqueness
On 06/29/2012 12:33 PM, EXTERNAL Konold Martin (erfrakon, RtP2/TEF72) wrote:
Hi,
thanks for the clarification!
1
Hi,
I am experiencing an error situation which gets not detected by the cluster.
I created a 2-node cluster using drbd and want to use ocfs2 on both nodes
simultaneously. (stripped off some monitor/meta stuff)
primitive dlm ocf:pacemaker:controld
primitive o2cb ocf:ocfs2:o2cb
primitive resDRBD
Hi,
I am experiencing an error situation which gets not detected by the cluster.
I created a 2-node cluster using drbd and want to use ocfs2 on both
nodes simultaneously. (stripped off some monitor/meta stuff)
bad idea ... pretty useless without the full configuration, especially
the
18 matches
Mail list logo
