Re: [Linux-HA] SANs falling over, don't know why!

Khamis Sent: 30 October 2011 20:44 To: General Linux-HA mailing list Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] SANs falling over, don't know why! Are you using the IPAddr2 primitive? Maybe post your configuration? Nick. On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 4:35 PM, James Smith james.sm...@m247.com wrote: Ipv4. Regards

Re: [Linux-HA] SANs falling over, don't know why!

:1 lun:6 by sid:5629499605320192 (Function Complete) Regards, James -Original Message- From: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org [mailto:linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org] On Behalf Of James Smith Sent: 30 October 2011 00:25 To: General Linux-HA mailing list Subject: Re: [Linux-HA

Re: [Linux-HA] SANs falling over, don't know why!

using IPV4 or 6? Nick. On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 4:29 AM, James Smith james.sm...@m247.com wrote: Well fileio hasn't solved the underlying issue, the SAN broke this morning at 6AM: Oct 30 06:01:19 iscsi1cl6 kernel: iscsi_trgt: Abort Task (01) issued on tid:1 lun:6 by sid:4222124721766912

[Linux-HA] SANs falling over, don't know why!

Hi, All of a sudden, a SAN pair which was running without any problems for six months, now decides to fall over every couple of hours. The logs I have to go on are below: Oct 29 19:09:23 iscsi2cl6 last message repeated 12 times Oct 29 19:09:23 iscsi2cl6 kernel: iscsi_trgt: Abort Task (01)

Re: [Linux-HA] SANs falling over, don't know why!

: [Linux-HA] SANs falling over, don't know why! Hello, On 10/29/2011 08:47 PM, James Smith wrote: Hi, All of a sudden, a SAN pair which was running without any problems for six months, now decides to fall over every couple of hours. So what did you change? ;-) The logs I have to go

[Linux-HA] Resources didn't failover when failed

Hi, I was presented with the following status of a two node cluster: [root@iscsi1cl2 primestaff]# crm_mon -fN Attempting connection to the cluster... Last updated: Sat Oct 22 18:10:07 2011 Stack: openais Current DC: iscsi1cl2 - partition with quorum Version:

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: Forkbomb not initiating failover

This is essentially what I want and I am surprised this isn't already the cause. Regards, James Smith -Original Message- From: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org [mailto:linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org] On Behalf Of Eric Warnke Sent: 11 July 2011 13:51 To: Florian Haas; General

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: Forkbomb not initiating failover

the master, so never knows its failed, this is crazy. Regards, James Smith -Original Message- From: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org [mailto:linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org] On Behalf Of Florian Haas Sent: 11 July 2011 08:39 To: General Linux-HA mailing list Cc: Warnke, Eric E Subject

[Linux-HA] Forkbomb not initiating failover

Hi, Summary: Two node cluster running DRBD, IET with a floating IP and stonith enabled. All this works well, I can kernel panic the machine, kill individual PIDs (for example IET) which then invoke failover. However, when I forkbomb the master, nothing happens. The box is dead, the services

Re: [Linux-HA] Forkbomb not initiating failover

-07 11:59, James Smith wrote: Hi, Summary: Two node cluster running DRBD, IET with a floating IP and stonith enabled. All this works well, I can kernel panic the machine, kill individual PIDs (for example IET) which then invoke failover. However, when I forkbomb the master, nothing

[Linux-HA] Config sanity check

Hi, I've been hitting some problems with my drbd / iscsi-target clusters, resources dropping in to FAILED (unmanaged) states etc. I'm after a bit of a sanity check on the config below. Firstly, I know the timesouts and intervals are lacking / too short on some resources. I'm also looking for

Re: [Linux-HA] start lsb resource on both nodes

Hi, Isn't the solution to clone the resource? clone rsc_clone rsc_name rsc_name being your lsb resource. You can then specify the clone name, rsc_clone, in any ordering constraints. Regards, James -Original Message- From: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org