The log from Patrick Begou shows the communication is dead among the two nodes after their initial communication.

I tried the combination (1.2.3 & 2.0.8) with a simple IP address v1 style resource. The communication is fine, one node can see the other node without problem. However the resource cannot start or fail over correctly. Two 2.0.8 nodes v1 style resource work correctly though. I opened a bug for this (#1544).

-guochun




Alan Robertson wrote:
Looks like something is broken between 1.2.x versions and 2.0.x versions
:-(.  This is the 2nd complaint about this in the last week.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject:
Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat compatibility question
From:
Patrick Begou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Fri, 06 Apr 2007 09:22:54 +0200
To:
General Linux-HA mailing list <linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org>

To:
General Linux-HA mailing list <linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org>


I have keep a log file, even if I do not find any usefull information for my (low) level of knowledge. It is attached, if it can help.
Dean is the 2.0.8 heartbeat node (FC6 X86_64) wich produce this log.
Ekman is the 1.2.3 heartbeat node (Sarge Amd64)

The only thing I notice are the messages:
info: flow control disabled due to different version heartbeat
info: Status update for node ekman: status active

I launch several hb_takeover commands (returning without doing anything) and finaly "/etc/init.d/heartbeat stop" (heartbeat -k freeze) but nothing appears in the logs (or I do not see them as I do not know what should be logged).
Heartbeat was ended by a "killall heartbeat" at the end of the log file.

About extra problems, yes they have nothing to deal with heartbeat. It was just to give some feedback to heartbeat users wich could reach into this situation.

Now heartbeat 1.2 runs fine and my HA cluster is available with one node in Sarge and one node in FC6. I will setup the second node and update heartbeat to 2.08 in the next weeks.

Patrick
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems


_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to