Re: [Linux-HA] [Pacemaker] crmsh: New syntax for location constraints, suggestions / comments

2013-12-13 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2013-12-13T13:51:27, Andrey Groshev wrote: > Just thought that I was missing in "location", something like: node=any :) Can you describe what this is supposed to achieve? "any" is the default for symmetric clusters anyway. Regards, Lars -- Architect Storage/HA SUSE LINUX Products Gmb

Re: [Linux-HA] [Pacemaker] crmsh: New syntax for location constraints, suggestions / comments

2013-12-13 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2013-12-13T10:16:41, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: > Lars (lmb) suggested that we might switch to using the { } - brackets > around resource sets everywhere for consistency. My only concern with > that would be that it would be a breaking change to the previous crmsh > syntax. Maybe that is okay