Lars Marowsky-Bree writes:
> "Poisoned resources" indeed should just fail to start and that should be
> that. What instead can happen is that the resource agent notices it
> can't start, reports back to the cluster, and the cluster manager goes
> "Oh no, I couldn't start the resource successfully
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 10:36:37PM +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
> Just a small comment, maybe of benefit to others...
>
> On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 16:31:13 -0400 William Seligman
> wrote:
> > "Poisoned resource"
> >
> > This is the one you can directly attribute to my stupidity.
> >
> > I add a
Just a small comment, maybe of benefit to others...
On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 16:31:13 -0400 William Seligman
wrote:
> "Poisoned resource"
>
> This is the one you can directly attribute to my stupidity.
>
> I add a new resource to the pacemaker configuration. Even though the
> pacemaker configuration
On 2013-07-01T16:31:13, William Seligman wrote:
> a) people can exclaim "You fool!" and point out all the stupid things I did
> wrong;
>
> b) sysadmins who are contemplating the switch to HA have additional points to
> add to the pros and cons.
I think you bring up an important point that I al
I know you're not looking for fixes, but there are a couple of points I would
make:
On 02/07/2013, at 6:31 AM, William Seligman wrote:
> I'm about to write a transition plan for getting rid of high-availability on
> our
> lab's cluster. Before I do that, I thought I'd put my reasons before thi
I'm about to write a transition plan for getting rid of high-availability on our
lab's cluster. Before I do that, I thought I'd put my reasons before this group
so that:
a) people can exclaim "You fool!" and point out all the stupid things I did
wrong;
b) sysadmins who are contemplating the swit
