On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Stallmann, Andreas astallm...@conet.de wrote:
Hi Andrew,
If suicide is no supported fencing option, why is it still included with
stonith?
Left over from heartbeat v1 days I guess.
Could also be a testing-only device like ssh.
www.clusterlabs.org tells me,
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Stallmann, Andreas
astallm...@conet.de wrote:
Hi!
I conentrate both your answers into one mail, I hope that's allright for you.
For now, I need an interim solution, which is, as of now, stonith via
suicide.
Doesn't work as suicide is not considered
Hi!
I conentrate both your answers into one mail, I hope that's allright for you.
For now, I need an interim solution, which is, as of now, stonith via
suicide.
Doesn't work as suicide is not considered reliable - by definition the
remaining nodes have no way to verify that the fencing
Hi!
TNX for your answer. We will switch to sbd after the shared storage has been
set up.
For now, I need an interim solution, which is, as of now, stonith via suicide.
My configuration doesn't work, though.
I tried:
~~Output from crm configure show~~
primitive suicide_res
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Stallmann, Andreas astallm...@conet.de wrote:
Hi!
TNX for your answer. We will switch to sbd after the shared storage has been
set up.
For now, I need an interim solution, which is, as of now, stonith via suicide.
Doesn't work as suicide is not considered
Hello!
I'm currently looking for a suitable stonith solution for our environment:
1. We have three cluster nodes running OpenSuSE 10.3 with corosync and
pacemaker.
2. The nodes reside on two VMware ESXi-Servers ( v. 4.1.0) in two locations,
where one VMware Server hosts two, the other hosts
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 09:55:00AM +, Stallmann, Andreas wrote:
Hello!
I'm currently looking for a suitable stonith solution for our environment:
1. We have three cluster nodes running OpenSuSE 10.3 with corosync and
pacemaker.
2. The nodes reside on two VMware ESXi-Servers (
Hi!
- (3) rules out sbd, as this method requires access to a physical device,
that offers the shared storage. Am I right? The manual explicitly says, that
sbd may even not be used on a DRBD-Partition. Question: Is there a way to
insert the sbd-Header on a mounted drive instead of a
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:19:20PM +, Stallmann, Andreas wrote:
Hi!
- (3) rules out sbd, as this method requires access to a physical device,
that offers the shared storage. Am I right? The manual explicitly says,
that sbd may even not be used on a DRBD-Partition. Question: Is there
Hi there!
...
Please no-one try a loop-mounted image file on NFS ;-) Even though in theory
it may work, if you mount -o sync ...
*Outch*
...
Does this help?
http://www.linux-ha.org/w/index.php?title=SBD_Fencingdiff=481oldid=97
Yes, this helps... somehow. Well, I should use iSCSI to share
10 matches
Mail list logo
