On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Steinhauer Juergen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it was my fault. I didn't set "ordered" as meta-attribute.
> Nevertheless, the wanted behaviour is still not achieved.
>
> I created a colocation like this:
>
> sequential="true">
>
>
>
>
> I would expect, t
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Gawith wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
>
>> Set ordered=false for the ip group. That will start them in parallel. I
>> think. Then specify a resource order constraint to start your app group
>> after the ip group and a colocation constraint to have the apps on the
>> same nod
Hi,
it was my fault. I didn't set "ordered" as meta-attribute.
Nevertheless, the wanted behaviour is still not achieved.
I created a colocation like this:
I would expect, that app_ips, the unordered group, will start in
parallel. After that, the app is started.
But I see
Am Montag, 13. Juli 2009 10:05:13 schrieb Steinhauer Juergen:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to create a group with ordered="false" in pacemaker 1.0.4,
> but this fails.
>
> Regards
Why does it fail? Any eror message? Nothing in the logs?
Hi,
I just tried to create a group with ordered="false" in pacemaker 1.0.4,
but this fails.
Regards
Lars Marowsky-Bree schrieb:
> On 2009-07-10T12:53:53, Gawith wrote:
>
>>> Set ordered=false for the ip group. That will start them in parallel. I
>>> think. Then specify a resource order constra
On 2009-07-10T12:53:53, Gawith wrote:
> > Set ordered=false for the ip group. That will start them in parallel. I
> > think. Then specify a resource order constraint to start your app group
> > after the ip group and a colocation constraint to have the apps on the
> > same node as the ips.
> As f
Hi Dominik,
> Set ordered=false for the ip group. That will start them in parallel. I
> think. Then specify a resource order constraint to start your app group
> after the ip group and a colocation constraint to have the apps on the
> same node as the ips.
>
As far as I know, setting "ordered=fa
Steinhauer Juergen wrote:
> Hi guys!
>
> In my cluster setup, I have 6 IP addresses which should be started in
> parallel for speed purpose, and two apps, depending on the six addresses.
>
> What would be the best way to configure this?
> Putting all IPs in a group will start them one after anoth
Hi guys!
In my cluster setup, I have 6 IP addresses which should be started in
parallel for speed purpose, and two apps, depending on the six addresses.
What would be the best way to configure this?
Putting all IPs in a group will start them one after another. Bad.
A colocation with a set includi
