Re: [Linux-ha-dev] OCF RA dev guide: final heads up

2010-12-10 Thread Florian Haas
On 2010-12-06 19:20, Alan Robertson wrote: On 12/06/2010 09:35 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: On a different matter: Perhaps it would be good to add a section about ocf-tester. Or would you consider that out of scope? Let me second that request. If you don't know about ocf-tester, then

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] OCF RA dev guide: final heads up

2010-12-10 Thread Florian Haas
On 2010-12-07 02:33, Tim Serong wrote: On a different matter: Perhaps it would be good to add a section about ocf-tester. Or would you consider that out of scope? Speaking of out-of-scope... A question came up the other day on #linux-cluster about if there's any documentation for

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] OCF RA dev guide: final heads up

2010-12-10 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Florian Haas florian.h...@linbit.com wrote: On 2010-12-08 18:15, alexander.kra...@basf.com wrote: Hi Florian, Section 5.10: The variables are missing a notify. It is: OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_notify_start_uname not OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_start_uname Thanks!

[Linux-ha-dev] Antwort: Re: OCF RA dev guide: final heads up

2010-12-10 Thread alexander . krauth
No Section: Is there a reason, why the environment variable 'OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_role', which is set in the monitor action, isn't mentioned anywhere ? Make a good case for it to be explained, and convince me that it won't just serve to confuse everybody, and I'll include it. My

[Linux-ha-dev] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: OCF RA dev guide: final heads up

2010-12-10 Thread alexander . krauth
No Section: Is there a reason, why the environment variable 'OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_role', which is set in the monitor action, isn't mentioned anywhere ? Make a good case for it to be explained, and convince me that it won't just serve to confuse everybody, and I'll include it.