On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 11:04:22PM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote:
On 08/07/2012 08:18 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:14:27AM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote:
The LRM treats operation timeouts as ERROR:s - not just failed
operations that give warnings. This
Hi Alan,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:14:27AM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote:
The LRM treats operation timeouts as ERROR:s - not just failed
operations that give warnings. This violates the meaning of ERROR:
messages in the code.
We reserved ERROR: messages for things that the software did
On 08/07/2012 08:18 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:14:27AM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote:
The LRM treats operation timeouts as ERROR:s - not just failed
operations that give warnings. This violates the meaning of ERROR:
messages in the code.
We reserved
The LRM treats operation timeouts as ERROR:s - not just failed
operations that give warnings. This violates the meaning of ERROR:
messages in the code.
We reserved ERROR: messages for things that the software did not expect
- and therefore possibly could not be properly recovered from. In