Re: [Linux-ha-dev] LRM bug

2012-08-08 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 11:04:22PM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote: On 08/07/2012 08:18 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi Alan, On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:14:27AM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote: The LRM treats operation timeouts as ERROR:s - not just failed operations that give warnings. This

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] LRM bug

2012-08-07 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi Alan, On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:14:27AM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote: The LRM treats operation timeouts as ERROR:s - not just failed operations that give warnings. This violates the meaning of ERROR: messages in the code. We reserved ERROR: messages for things that the software did

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] LRM bug

2012-08-07 Thread Alan Robertson
On 08/07/2012 08:18 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi Alan, On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:14:27AM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote: The LRM treats operation timeouts as ERROR:s - not just failed operations that give warnings. This violates the meaning of ERROR: messages in the code. We reserved

[Linux-ha-dev] LRM bug

2012-07-30 Thread Alan Robertson
The LRM treats operation timeouts as ERROR:s - not just failed operations that give warnings. This violates the meaning of ERROR: messages in the code. We reserved ERROR: messages for things that the software did not expect - and therefore possibly could not be properly recovered from. In