Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: [Linux-HA] Recovering from unexpected bad things - is STONITH the answer?

2007-11-07 Thread Peter R. Badovinatz
Alan Robertson wrote: Kevin Tomlinson wrote: On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 10:25 -0700, Alan Robertson wrote: We now have the ComponentFail test in CTS. Thanks Lars for getting it going! And, in the process, it's showing up some kinds of problems that we hadn't been looking for before. A couple

[Linux-ha-dev] Re: [Linux-HA] Recovering from unexpected bad things - is STONITH the answer?

2007-11-07 Thread Yan Fitterer
Alan Robertson wrote: Yan Fitterer wrote: Not always. The case I have encountered (live) doesn't relate to HB component failure per se, but is nevertheless destructive. With an eDirectory load (and other database-backed software with large or lazily flushed write buffers would be similarly

[Linux-ha-dev] Re: [Linux-HA] Recovering from unexpected bad things - is STONITH the answer?

2007-11-06 Thread Alan Robertson
Kevin Tomlinson wrote: On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 10:25 -0700, Alan Robertson wrote: We now have the ComponentFail test in CTS. Thanks Lars for getting it going! And, in the process, it's showing up some kinds of problems that we hadn't been looking for before. A couple examples of such