On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 09:50, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Hannes Eder wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 17:13, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>>> On 2009-07-21T17:24:56, Hannes Eder wrote:
>>>
Hi,
Some parts of the linux-ha code base might benefit from a li
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Hannes Eder wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 17:13, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>> On 2009-07-21T17:24:56, Hannes Eder wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Some parts of the linux-ha code base might benefit from a little code
>>> cleanup. In this case the question arises whic
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 17:13, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2009-07-21T17:24:56, Hannes Eder wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some parts of the linux-ha code base might benefit from a little code
>> cleanup. In this case the question arises which coding style should
>> be applied. I did not find any docu
On 2009-07-21T17:24:56, Hannes Eder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some parts of the linux-ha code base might benefit from a little code
> cleanup. In this case the question arises which coding style should
> be applied. I did not find any documentation on that in the linux-ha
> source tree. Did I miss som
Hi,
Some parts of the linux-ha code base might benefit from a little code
cleanup. In this case the question arises which coding style should
be applied. I did not find any documentation on that in the linux-ha
source tree. Did I miss something?
What about obeying to Documentation/CodingStyle
