On Jun 1, 2006, at 3:56 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:On 2006-05-31T07:37:34, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: are you saying that there should be higher limit or no limit in IPC-only messages? I think the message layer can provide another API for that I don't remember how much burden such
On 2006-05-31T07:37:34, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >are you saying that there should be higher limit or no limit in IPC-only
> >messages? I think the message layer can provide another API for that
>
> I don't remember how much burden such a change would be on the IPC layer.
>
>
Guochun Shi wrote:
Alan Robertson wrote:
Guochun Shi wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 5/29/06, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE
cannot
> send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefini
Alan Robertson wrote:
Guochun Shi wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 5/29/06, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE
cannot
> send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefinitely.
So, that mean
Guochun Shi wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 5/29/06, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE
cannot
> send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefinitely.
So, that means the CIB is > 256K com
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 5/29/06, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE
cannot
> send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefinitely.
So, that means the CIB is > 256K compressed? Or is it >
On 5/29/06, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/29/06, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE cannot
> > send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefinitely.
>
> So, that means the
On 5/29/06, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006-05-29T06:44:05, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE cannot
> >send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefinitely.
>
> So,
On 5/29/06, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE cannot
> send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefinitely.
So, that means the CIB is > 256K compressed? Or is it > 256K uncompressed?
its
On 2006-05-29T06:44:05, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE cannot
> >send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefinitely.
>
> So, that means the CIB is > 256K compressed? Or is it > 256K
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE cannot
send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefinitely.
So, that means the CIB is > 256K compressed? Or is it > 256K uncompressed?
We could increase the value but looking through the code this
11 matches
Mail list logo