Re: [Linux-ha-dev] MAXMSG too small

2006-06-01 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Jun 1, 2006, at 3:56 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:On 2006-05-31T07:37:34, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: are you saying that there should be higher limit or no limit in IPC-only messages? I think the message layer can provide another API for that I don't remember how much burden such

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] MAXMSG too small

2006-06-01 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2006-05-31T07:37:34, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >are you saying that there should be higher limit or no limit in IPC-only > >messages? I think the message layer can provide another API for that > > I don't remember how much burden such a change would be on the IPC layer. > >

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] MAXMSG too small

2006-05-31 Thread Alan Robertson
Guochun Shi wrote: Alan Robertson wrote: Guochun Shi wrote: Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 5/29/06, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andrew Beekhof wrote: > Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE cannot > send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefini

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] MAXMSG too small

2006-05-30 Thread Guochun Shi
Alan Robertson wrote: Guochun Shi wrote: Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 5/29/06, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andrew Beekhof wrote: > Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE cannot > send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefinitely. So, that mean

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] MAXMSG too small

2006-05-30 Thread Alan Robertson
Guochun Shi wrote: Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 5/29/06, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andrew Beekhof wrote: > Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE cannot > send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefinitely. So, that means the CIB is > 256K com

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] MAXMSG too small

2006-05-30 Thread Guochun Shi
Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 5/29/06, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andrew Beekhof wrote: > Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE cannot > send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefinitely. So, that means the CIB is > 256K compressed? Or is it >

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] MAXMSG too small

2006-05-29 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 5/29/06, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/29/06, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE cannot > > send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefinitely. > > So, that means the

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] MAXMSG too small

2006-05-29 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 5/29/06, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2006-05-29T06:44:05, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE cannot > >send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefinitely. > > So,

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] MAXMSG too small

2006-05-29 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 5/29/06, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andrew Beekhof wrote: > Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE cannot > send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefinitely. So, that means the CIB is > 256K compressed? Or is it > 256K uncompressed? its

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] MAXMSG too small

2006-05-29 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2006-05-29T06:44:05, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE cannot > >send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefinitely. > > So, that means the CIB is > 256K compressed? Or is it > 256K

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] MAXMSG too small

2006-05-29 Thread Alan Robertson
Andrew Beekhof wrote: Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE cannot send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefinitely. So, that means the CIB is > 256K compressed? Or is it > 256K uncompressed? We could increase the value but looking through the code this