Re: [Linux-HA] hb_standby in 3.0.3

2010-12-21 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
Dimitri Maziuk wrote: - doesn't seem to do anything other than print hb_standby[6096]: Going standby [all]. Neither does hb_takeover on the other node. They aren't even logging anything. Is this the expected behaviour (this is r1-style setup w/ haresources)? The winning answer is

Re: [Linux-HA] hb_standby in 3.0.3

2010-12-21 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:43:23AM -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: Dimitri Maziuk wrote: - doesn't seem to do anything other than print hb_standby[6096]: Going standby [all]. Neither does hb_takeover on the other node. They aren't even logging anything. Is this the expected

Re: [Linux-HA] hb_standby in 3.0.3

2010-12-21 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
Lars Ellenberg wrote: Uhm, no, that message is still there. The code in question has not been changed. That may be, but it's not in my logs where it actually helps. (There seems to be nothing in /var/log/messages from 3.0.3 running in R1 mode; where 2.1.4 was annoyingly verbose at times,

[Linux-HA] hb_standby in 3.0.3

2010-12-17 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
- doesn't seem to do anything other than print hb_standby[6096]: Going standby [all]. Neither does hb_takeover on the other node. They aren't even logging anything. Is this the expected behaviour (this is r1-style setup w/ haresources)? Dima -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin