Re: [PATCH] Fix socket bitop damage
From: Ralf Baechle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:02:18 +0100 > The socket flag cleanups that went into 2.6.12-rc1 are basically oring > the flags of an old socket into the socket just being created. > Unfortunately that one was just initialized by sock_init_data(), so already > has SOCK_ZAPPED set. As the result zapped sockets are created and all > incoming connection will fail due to this bug which again was carefully > replicated to at least AX.25, NET/ROM or ROSE. > > In order to keep the abstraction alive I've introduced sock_copy_flags() > to copy the socket flags from one sockets to another and used that > instead of the bitwise copy thing. Anyway, the idea here has probably > been to copy all flags, so sock_copy_flags() should be the right thing. > With this the ham radio protocols are usable again, so I hope this will > make it into 2.6.13. > > Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle DL5RB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied, thanks Ralf. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] Fix socket bitop damage
* Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-08-22 13:14 > * Ralf Baechle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-08-22 12:02 > > The socket flag cleanups that went into 2.6.12-rc1 are basically oring > > the flags of an old socket into the socket just being created. > > Unfortunately that one was just initialized by sock_init_data(), so already > > has SOCK_ZAPPED set. As the result zapped sockets are created and all > > incoming connection will fail due to this bug which again was carefully > > replicated to at least AX.25, NET/ROM or ROSE. > > I'm probably to one to blame here but I don't get the point yet. Never mind, I got it, sk->sk_flags may be be != 0. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] Fix socket bitop damage
* Ralf Baechle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-08-22 12:02 > The socket flag cleanups that went into 2.6.12-rc1 are basically oring > the flags of an old socket into the socket just being created. > Unfortunately that one was just initialized by sock_init_data(), so already > has SOCK_ZAPPED set. As the result zapped sockets are created and all > incoming connection will fail due to this bug which again was carefully > replicated to at least AX.25, NET/ROM or ROSE. I'm probably to one to blame here but I don't get the point yet. What I did was to change the bitfield based flags to use sk_flags like this: - sk->sk_zapped = osk->sk_zapped; + + if (sock_flag(osk, SOCK_ZAPPED)) + sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED); - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[PATCH] Fix socket bitop damage
The socket flag cleanups that went into 2.6.12-rc1 are basically oring
the flags of an old socket into the socket just being created.
Unfortunately that one was just initialized by sock_init_data(), so already
has SOCK_ZAPPED set. As the result zapped sockets are created and all
incoming connection will fail due to this bug which again was carefully
replicated to at least AX.25, NET/ROM or ROSE.
In order to keep the abstraction alive I've introduced sock_copy_flags()
to copy the socket flags from one sockets to another and used that
instead of the bitwise copy thing. Anyway, the idea here has probably
been to copy all flags, so sock_copy_flags() should be the right thing.
With this the ham radio protocols are usable again, so I hope this will
make it into 2.6.13.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle DL5RB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
include/net/sock.h |5 +
net/ax25/af_ax25.c |7 +--
net/netrom/af_netrom.c |7 +--
net/rose/af_rose.c |7 +--
4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Index: linux-cvs/net/netrom/af_netrom.c
===
--- linux-cvs.orig/net/netrom/af_netrom.c
+++ linux-cvs/net/netrom/af_netrom.c
@@ -465,12 +465,7 @@ static struct sock *nr_make_new(struct s
sk->sk_sndbuf = osk->sk_sndbuf;
sk->sk_state= TCP_ESTABLISHED;
sk->sk_sleep= osk->sk_sleep;
-
- if (sock_flag(osk, SOCK_ZAPPED))
- sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED);
-
- if (sock_flag(osk, SOCK_DBG))
- sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DBG);
+ sock_copy_flags(sk, osk);
skb_queue_head_init(&nr->ack_queue);
skb_queue_head_init(&nr->reseq_queue);
Index: linux-cvs/include/net/sock.h
===
--- linux-cvs.orig/include/net/sock.h
+++ linux-cvs/include/net/sock.h
@@ -384,6 +384,11 @@ enum sock_flags {
SOCK_QUEUE_SHRUNK, /* write queue has been shrunk recently */
};
+static inline void sock_copy_flags(struct sock *nsk, struct sock *osk)
+{
+ nsk->sk_flags = osk->sk_flags;
+}
+
static inline void sock_set_flag(struct sock *sk, enum sock_flags flag)
{
__set_bit(flag, &sk->sk_flags);
Index: linux-cvs/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
===
--- linux-cvs.orig/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
+++ linux-cvs/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
@@ -884,12 +884,7 @@ struct sock *ax25_make_new(struct sock *
sk->sk_sndbuf = osk->sk_sndbuf;
sk->sk_state= TCP_ESTABLISHED;
sk->sk_sleep= osk->sk_sleep;
-
- if (sock_flag(osk, SOCK_DBG))
- sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DBG);
-
- if (sock_flag(osk, SOCK_ZAPPED))
- sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED);
+ sock_copy_flags(sk, osk);
oax25 = ax25_sk(osk);
Index: linux-cvs/net/rose/af_rose.c
===
--- linux-cvs.orig/net/rose/af_rose.c
+++ linux-cvs/net/rose/af_rose.c
@@ -556,12 +556,7 @@ static struct sock *rose_make_new(struct
sk->sk_sndbuf = osk->sk_sndbuf;
sk->sk_state= TCP_ESTABLISHED;
sk->sk_sleep= osk->sk_sleep;
-
- if (sock_flag(osk, SOCK_ZAPPED))
- sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED);
-
- if (sock_flag(osk, SOCK_DBG))
- sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DBG);
+ sock_copy_flags(sk, osk);
init_timer(&rose->timer);
init_timer(&rose->idletimer);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
