[PATCH] NET:AX25:ROSE NULL ax25_cb kernel panic

[PATCH] [ROSE] NULL ax25_cb kernel panic When an internally generated frame is handled by rose_xmit(), rose_route_frame() is called: if (!rose_route_frame(skb, NULL)) { dev_kfree_skb(skb); stats->tx_errors++; return NETDEV_TX_OK; }

Re: [PATCH] NET:AX25:ROSE NULL ax25_cb kernel panic

On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 11:58 AM f6bvp wrote: > > > [PATCH] [ROSE] NULL ax25_cb kernel panic > > When an internally generated frame is handled by rose_xmit(), > rose_route_frame() is called: > > if (!rose_route_frame(skb, NULL)) { > dev_kfree_skb(skb); > sta

OT: Global AX.25 status?

Hi all, As a newly-appointed Secretary of YU7/YT7 ham radio union, where I planned to revive AX.25 infrastructure, I faced to a strong opposition and (mis)belief claiming that the 'old-fashioned' packet mode is "dead". And yes, apart sporadic APRS activity, packet (in its 'connected' mode) i

Is AX.25 UI frame destination address case-sensitive?

Hi all, A silly question, is the destination address in a UI frame case-sensitive? Reason I ask is I'm looking at a way I can differentiate between a SSID used to identify a *station*, versus a SSID that is being used by multiple stations as a "multicast" address. The thinking here is if I want

Re: Is AX.25 UI frame destination address case-sensitive?

Hi Stuart, On Sun, 20 Jan 2019, at 2:32 PM, Stuart Longland (VK4MSL) wrote: >A group name, which may not necessarily be a call-sign, could be >encoded as lower-case. > >I have no idea how existing AX.25 stacks (Linux kernel, G8BPQ, >AGWPE, TheNet, TNCs, etc) would react to such fr