Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] gve: Minor cleanups

2024-05-10 Thread patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski : On Wed, 08 May 2024 09:32:18 +0100 you wrote: > Hi, > > This short patchset provides two minor cleanups for the gve driver. > > These were found by tooling as mentioned in each patch, > and otherwise by

Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] dt-bindings: dma: Document STM32 DMA3 controller bindings

2024-05-10 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 02:54:34PM +0200, Amelie Delaunay wrote: > The STM32 DMA3 is a Direct Memory Access controller with different features > depending on its hardware configuration. > The channels have not the same capabilities, some have a larger FIFO, so > their performance is higher. > This

Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] dt-bindings: dma: New directory for STM32 DMA controllers bindings

2024-05-10 Thread Rob Herring (Arm)
On Tue, 07 May 2024 14:54:31 +0200, Amelie Delaunay wrote: > Gather the STM32 DMA controllers bindings under ./dma/stm32/. > Then fix reference to old path in spi/st,stm32-spi.yaml: update the dmas > property description by referring to all STM32 DMA controllers bindings. > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH] fs: fix unintentional arithmetic wraparound in offset calculation

2024-05-10 Thread Justin Stitt
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 8:15 AM Jan Kara wrote: > > On Thu 09-05-24 21:34:58, Justin Stitt wrote: > > --- > > fs/read_write.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c > > index d4c036e82b6c..10c3eaa5ef55 100644 > > ---

Re: [PATCH] fs: fix unintentional arithmetic wraparound in offset calculation

2024-05-10 Thread Jan Kara
On Thu 09-05-24 21:34:58, Justin Stitt wrote: > When running syzkaller with the newly reintroduced signed integer > overflow sanitizer we encounter this report: > > [ 67.991989] [ cut here ] > [ 67.995501] UBSAN: signed-integer-overflow in ../fs/read_write.c:91:10 > [

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/5] KVM: x86: Add notifications for Heki policy configuration and violation

2024-05-10 Thread Nicolas Saenz Julienne
On Tue May 7, 2024 at 4:16 PM UTC, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > If yes, that would indeed require a *lot* of work for something we're not > > sure will be accepted later on. > > Yes and no. The AWS folks are pursuing VSM support in KVM+QEMU, and SVSM > support > is trending toward the paired

Re: [PATCH] libfs: fix accidental overflow in offset calculation

2024-05-10 Thread Al Viro
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 07:33:12AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > As the matter of fact, it would be interesting to find out > which instances, if any, do *not* have that relationship > between SEEK_CUR and SEEK_SET. If such are rare, it might > make sense to mark them as such in file_operations and >

Re: [PATCH] libfs: fix accidental overflow in offset calculation

2024-05-10 Thread Al Viro
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 05:48:05AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 03:26:08AM +, Justin Stitt wrote: > > > This feels like a case of accidental correctness. You demonstrated that > > even with overflow we end up going down a control path that returns an > > error code so all