Hello,
as we understand, this commit is not the root-cause of this WARNING. the WARNING
just shows in another way by commit changes.
53ed0af496422959 7bd230a26648ac68ab3731ebbc4
---
fail:runs %reproductionfail:runs
|
While removing CONFIG_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL, ARCH_HAS_UBSAN wasn't correctly
depended on. Restore this, as we do not want to attempt UBSAN builds
unless it's actually been tested on a given architecture.
Reported-by: Masahiro Yamada
Closes:
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 06:54:26PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> All architectures can enable UBSAN regardless of ARCH_HAS_UBSAN
> because there is no "depends on ARCH_HAS_UBSAN" line.
>
> Fixes: 918327e9b7ff ("ubsan: Remove CONFIG_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL")
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
Oh, er,
On Mon 13-05-24 17:50:30, Justin Stitt wrote:
> Running syzkaller with the newly enabled signed integer overflow
> sanitizer produces this report:
>
> [ 195.401651] [ cut here ]
> [ 195.404808] UBSAN: signed-integer-overflow in ../fs/open.c:321:15
> [ 195.408739]
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 10:07:00AM +, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> On Tue May 7, 2024 at 4:16 PM UTC, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > If yes, that would indeed require a *lot* of work for something we're not
> > > sure will be accepted later on.
> >
> > Yes and no. The AWS folks are
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 09:16:06AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2024, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> > > Actually, potential bad/crazy idea. Why does the _host_ need to define
> > > policy?
> > > Linux already knows what assets it wants to (un)protect and when. What's
> > >
On Tue, May 07 2024 at 04:34, Justin Stitt wrote:
> Using syzkaller alongside the newly reintroduced signed integer overflow
> sanitizer spits out this report:
>
> [ 138.454979] [ cut here ]
> [ 138.458089] UBSAN: signed-integer-overflow in ../kernel/time/ntp.c:461:16
> [
All architectures can enable UBSAN regardless of ARCH_HAS_UBSAN
because there is no "depends on ARCH_HAS_UBSAN" line.
Fixes: 918327e9b7ff ("ubsan: Remove CONFIG_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL")
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 -
arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 -
arch/arm64/Kconfig
Snipped all the bits where you are clearly correct.
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 12:43:37PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c:852 usbtmc_generic_read() warn: potential
> > integer overflow from user 'max_transfer_size + 1'
> >842 * wMaxPacketSize – 1) to
On Mon, 2024-05-13 at 11:48 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> In the future can you CC the various maintainers of the affected
> tooling? :)
>
> On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 10:35:41PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> > This patch set removes many instances of the following variables:
> >
> > -
10 matches
Mail list logo