Hi Kees and Christophe,
First of all, thanks for the reviews, comments and advices.
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 09:23:15AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Sun, May 05, 2024 at 07:31:24PM +0200, Erick Archer wrote:
> > On Sun, May 05, 2024 at 05:24:55PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > > Le
Le 06/05/2024 à 18:23, Kees Cook a écrit :
On Sun, May 05, 2024 at 07:31:24PM +0200, Erick Archer wrote:
On Sun, May 05, 2024 at 05:24:55PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
Le 05/05/2024 à 16:15, Erick Archer a écrit :
diff --git a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
On Sun, May 05, 2024 at 07:31:24PM +0200, Erick Archer wrote:
> On Sun, May 05, 2024 at 05:24:55PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > Le 05/05/2024 à 16:15, Erick Archer a écrit :
> > > diff --git a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
> > > index 4013408ce012..080537eff69f
On Sun, May 05, 2024 at 05:24:55PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 05/05/2024 à 16:15, Erick Archer a écrit :
> > diff --git a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
> > index 4013408ce012..080537eff69f 100644
> > --- a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
> > +++
Le 05/05/2024 à 16:15, Erick Archer a écrit :
This is an effort to get rid of all multiplications from allocation
functions in order to prevent integer overflows [1][2].
As the "rb" variable is a pointer to "struct perf_buffer" and this
structure ends in a flexible array:
struct perf_buffer {
This is an effort to get rid of all multiplications from allocation
functions in order to prevent integer overflows [1][2].
As the "rb" variable is a pointer to "struct perf_buffer" and this
structure ends in a flexible array:
struct perf_buffer {
[...]
void*data_pages[];
};
