Am 04.05.2017 15:42, schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> On 05/04/2017 12:31 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 09:28:19AM +0200, walter harms wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 03.05.2017 21:31, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
Static checkers complain about these missing break statements.
Fixes:
On 05/04/2017 12:31 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 09:28:19AM +0200, walter harms wrote:
Am 03.05.2017 21:31, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
Static checkers complain about these missing break statements.
Fixes: 6eaaea144dc5 ("hwmon: (pmbus) Add client driver for IR35221")
On Thu, 4 May 2017 11:35:06 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> There is no reason to treat the IT8705F differently during device
> detection. If a single IT8705F chip indeed answers to both Super-IO
> addresses, we have code in place to detect the duplicate device
> address and skip the second one.
>
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 09:28:19AM +0200, walter harms wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.05.2017 21:31, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> > Static checkers complain about these missing break statements.
> >
> > Fixes: 6eaaea144dc5 ("hwmon: (pmbus) Add client driver for IR35221")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
Am 03.05.2017 21:31, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> Static checkers complain about these missing break statements.
>
> Fixes: 6eaaea144dc5 ("hwmon: (pmbus) Add client driver for IR35221")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/ir35221.c