On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 5:01 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> Again, I fail to understand why waiting for a multiple of 20 seconds
> under any circumstances would make any sense. Maybe the idea was
> to divide us by 1000 before entering the second loop ?
Yes, that's very clearly a mistake of mine.
>
Now that instances of input_dev support polling mode natively,
we no longer need to create input_polled_dev instance.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
---
drivers/hwmon/Kconfig| 1 -
drivers/hwmon/applesmc.c | 38 ++
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 21
Hi Dmitry,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on hwmon/hwmon-next]
[cannot apply to v5.4-rc1 next-20191002]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 02:43:45PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Now that instances of input_dev support polling mode natively,
> we no longer need to create input_polled_dev instance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
Applied to hwmon-next.
I don't know what 0-day is complaining about; the
On 10/2/19 2:43 PM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 5:01 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
Again, I fail to understand why waiting for a multiple of 20 seconds
under any circumstances would make any sense. Maybe the idea was
to divide us by 1000 before entering the second loop ?
Yes,
