On 2023/11/22 1:00, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 03:47:48PM +0900, Hector Martin wrote:
>>> Which is sensitive only to !NULL fwspec, and if EPROBE_DEFER is
>>> returned fwspec will be freed and dev->iommu->fwspec will be NULL
>>> here.
>
On 2023/11/19 23:13, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 06:19:43PM +0900, Hector Martin wrote:
>>>> +static int iommu_fwspec_assign_iommu(struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec,
>>>> + struct device *dev,
>>>> +
On 2023/11/19 17:10, Hector Martin wrote:
> On 2023/11/15 23:05, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> Allow fwspec to exist independently from the dev->iommu by providing
>> functions to allow allocating and freeing the raw struct iommu_fwspec.
>>
>> Reflow the existing paths
one defers, ops will
be NULL here and the check will fail with EINVAL.
Adding a check for that case here fixes it:
if (!ops)
return driver_deferred_probe_check_state(dev);
With that, for the whole series:
Tested-by: Hector Martin
I can't specifically
