On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 01:15:36AM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 01:40:21PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 01:04:57PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Wolfram,
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:21:10 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
The issue was truly solved by
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:48:29 +0200, Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de
wrote:
The timeout value is in jiffies, so it should be using HZ, not a plain
number. Assume with HZ=100 '100' means 1s here and adapt accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de
Cc: Eric Miao
Dne Út 20. dubna 2010 10:27:00 Marc Zyngier napsal(a):
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:48:29 +0200, Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de
wrote:
The timeout value is in jiffies, so it should be using HZ, not a plain
number. Assume with HZ=100 '100' means 1s here and adapt accordingly.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote:
Dne Út 20. dubna 2010 10:27:00 Marc Zyngier napsal(a):
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:48:29 +0200, Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de
wrote:
The timeout value is in jiffies, so it should be using HZ, not a plain
number.
From: Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org
Subject: i2c-stub: Add support for bus multiplexing
Emulate a PCA9540 mux chip on request. There are two reasons for
implementing this:
* This makes it possible to emulate two chips at the same address.
* This lets us test the multiplexing code.
Ben Dooks ben-li...@fluff.org writes:
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:42:12AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
This series of davinci I2C driver updates and fixes is targetted for
2.6.35. It has been tested in davinci git on multiple davinci SoCs.
Ben, since these changes are isolated to the davinci
Emulate a PCA9540 mux chip on request. There are two reasons for
implementing this:
* This makes it possible to emulate two chips at the same address.
* This lets us test the multiplexing code.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare kh...@linux-fr.org
Cc: Michael Lawnick ml.lawn...@gmx.de
Cc: Rodolfo
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c/pnx: Really fix start/stop issue
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 01:15:36AM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 01:40:21PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 01:04:57PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Wolfram,
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 05:10:42PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
Emulate a PCA9540 mux chip on request. There are two reasons for
implementing this:
* This makes it possible to emulate two chips at the same address.
* This lets us test the multiplexing code.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare
