On 11/16/2011 10:28 AM, Pratyush ANAND wrote:
There are few drivers(for example stmpe-gpio) which are available on i2c
bus but has been initialized as subsys initcall. Therefore i2c driver
must also be initialized as subsys initcall.
Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand pratyush.an...@st.com
---
On 11/16/2011 1:52 PM, Baruch Siach wrote:
Dependencies should be stated explicitly. Since this subsys_initcall thing is
quite common among the i2c masters I'm willing to ack this one for now. But
the real solution is to make the dependencies between devices clear and
explicit.
Baruch,
Hi Viresh,
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 04:32:08PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 11/16/2011 1:52 PM, Baruch Siach wrote:
Dependencies should be stated explicitly. Since this subsys_initcall thing
is
quite common among the i2c masters I'm willing to ack this one for now. But
the real
Hi Shiraz,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:57:19AM +0530, Shiraz Hashim wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 01:14:41PM +0800, Baruch Siach wrote:
Hi Pratyush Anand,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:28:07AM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
There are few drivers(for example stmpe-gpio) which are available
Hi Pratyush Anand,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:28:07AM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
There are few drivers(for example stmpe-gpio) which are available on i2c
bus but has been initialized as subsys initcall. Therefore i2c driver
must also be initialized as subsys initcall.
Signed-off-by:
Hi Baruch,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 01:14:41PM +0800, Baruch Siach wrote:
Hi Pratyush Anand,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:28:07AM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
There are few drivers(for example stmpe-gpio) which are available on i2c
bus but has been initialized as subsys initcall. Therefore
