Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: Mark adapter devices with pm_runtime_no_callbacks

2015-04-22 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 01:05:19PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote: Commit 523c5b89640e (i2c: Remove support for legacy PM) removed the PM ops from the bus type, which causes the pm operations on the s3c2410 adapter device to fail (-ENOSUPP in rpm_callback). The adapter device doesn't get bound to

Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: Mark adapter devices with pm_runtime_no_callbacks

2015-04-22 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 02:28:02PM +0200, Beata Michalska wrote: On 04/16/2015 02:05 PM, Charles Keepax wrote: Commit 523c5b89640e (i2c: Remove support for legacy PM) removed the PM ops from the bus type, which causes the pm operations on the s3c2410 adapter device to fail (-ENOSUPP in

Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: Mark adapter devices with pm_runtime_no_callbacks

2015-04-16 Thread Beata Michalska
On 04/16/2015 02:05 PM, Charles Keepax wrote: Commit 523c5b89640e (i2c: Remove support for legacy PM) removed the PM ops from the bus type, which causes the pm operations on the s3c2410 adapter device to fail (-ENOSUPP in rpm_callback). The adapter device doesn't get bound to a driver and as